Embean, your post has been moved to the Real Estate thread for this project. Oh, and welcome to UT!
|
|
|
- Thread starter AlbertC
- Start date
Fuu76
New Member
This project is a good step in redeveloping towards the Dufferin stretch, but I do agree with many of your sentiments that the building looks cheap. You should see the inside of the building also (not sure if it's reflected in those PDI vids) - I'll take a couple of pics later when I get a chance. However, with that said, the original pricing of the units here were amazing for the location. $350/SqFt for "Liberty Village" or "wQw" is pretty damned good.
The line given by the builder is that the bridge has to get approval from the railways since they own the land, which it has not been able to do yet. I wonder who would have to pay for the bridge, the builder, the city or the railway? Judging from the Concord bridge at Front, perhaps the builder? So I don't think the builder is making too hard an effort to do so. Perhaps it's waiting for the other phases to be built to make a stronger argument for required pedestrian access.
The line given by the builder is that the bridge has to get approval from the railways since they own the land, which it has not been able to do yet. I wonder who would have to pay for the bridge, the builder, the city or the railway? Judging from the Concord bridge at Front, perhaps the builder? So I don't think the builder is making too hard an effort to do so. Perhaps it's waiting for the other phases to be built to make a stronger argument for required pedestrian access.
apom
New Member
most likely the builder. I don't know what the wait is.
Ahh I just an arial render for kingclub condos with no pictures of the bridge.
Ahh I just an arial render for kingclub condos with no pictures of the bridge.
Last edited:
junctionist
Senior Member
Maybe it's another WQW bait-and-switch, like the original design for Westside Lofts.