zzkwilliamcanada
New Member
if they could make this happen, i will streakingIf this doesn't get built, I'll weep.
if they could make this happen, i will streakingIf this doesn't get built, I'll weep.
Yes, that's what I was thinking too. A place for the crazies and wingnuts to claim as their own and hang out in perpetuity.A junior version of Yonge and Dundas?
i dont care about the sidewalks... just build it.They managed more open space than I was expecting with three towers.
Edit ... oh, there's no sidewalks. It's plausible. Having no sidewalks does make the open private space appear larger
You want small units with low ceilings priced at $1,500 per sq ft?This looks like a Vancouver project.
Give me a Vancouver project PLEASE.
It's three tall towers and, while we don''t have an overall impression, the density and height stats are akin to (suburban) Vancouver and Toronto. The open spaces in all facets are paramount.Where in those renders do you not see sidewalks?![]()
Agreed.It's three tall towers and, while we don''t have an overall impression, the density and height stats are akin to (suburban) Vancouver and Toronto. The open spaces in all facets are paramount.
The point is that the private open space is smaller than it is in the rendering. It doesn't matter if it turns out like the render porn. Three storeys of structural glazing is $$$$. With that in mind, developers have a history in separating public space (like sidewalks) from the privately owned public space (POPS) which will give this a drastically different look.
If I had to guess, I'd assume because they expect opposition to the proposed height, so they don't want to highlight it.Interesting that they're primarily coming at it from showing off the podium and only the podium. They're understand it isn't really about the towers at this point.