Unknown User
New Member
I think the market for Tanev was a second round pick +, great player, who is clearly a rental, could help on a cup run but has documented injury issues. My bigger gripe with the trade was including the salary retention, since the Flames have been so reluctant to in the past, this seems like an odd place to give up one of the retention slots. I assume this was palatable since the retention doesn't go beyond the season and they could, if they wanted to, still retain on both Hanafin and Markstrom but seems like an odd decision to me to give that up + Tanev for less than a first.