darwink
Senior Member
Even then, the additional funding was beyond 2026. It is the nature of the funding cycle.They also said the same things back in 2017; but no new funding from Alberta or Canada has been given
Even then, the additional funding was beyond 2026. It is the nature of the funding cycle.They also said the same things back in 2017; but no new funding from Alberta or Canada has been given
It requires federal sign off, not provincial, since it fulfills the requirements the province laid out.This is still not a go yet, is it? The city is celebrating a nothing accomplishment again, this still requires and provincial and federal sign-off. We're getting close, no doubt but unless I'm not understanding correctly, no new work is starting anytime soon.
Province said their commitment stands as long as the line still connects to the Red and Blue lines, and to their so-called "Grand Central Station" site. Feds need a new business case submitted in the next couple of weeks to, in their words, ensure it still meets the intent of their infrastructure funding program, but I am sure it will - I just hope they don't drag their feet on their review.This is still not a go yet, is it? The city is celebrating a nothing accomplishment again, this still requires and provincial and federal sign-off. We're getting close, no doubt but unless I'm not understanding correctly, no new work is starting anytime soon.
I mean I can see why they're including the additional phases in the business case. This phase has an awful business case. That doesn't mean they shouldn't get on with it but the city has tapped themselves out of any additional funding until 2032.a new business case
During the height of the public bickering, the Green Line still only claimed that each month of delay added $1.5M to the capital costs, not the $100+M we have seen.How many billion would have been saved had the UCP and Rick McIver not put funding on hold for 2 years during COVID when we were still the only major project of this kind in NA? And all to review it and find nothing worth changing. And now they will point out this insufficient, butchered Phase 1 and say: “see! It wasn’t worth doing.”
But that's for over 3 million passenger-trips a day, enabling travel to all parts of the city and even beyond. Green Line Stage 1 will be lucky to get the claimed 32K trips/day and will have little to no benefit to 95% of the population.Just some rough napkin math to go with my post above:
Average cost to own a vehicle per year is about $15,000 (The Star says $16644)
Assume 400,000 cars in Calgary, that's $6billion annually.
In other words, Calgarians are collectively paying for an entire green line every year, just in personal vehicle costs. A decade of car ownership costs builds this project 10 times over.
That doesn't include any of the infrastructure costs, road maintenance, environmental or other effects etc. That's just the atomized individual cost of car ownership.
Sorry to reply to an old comment, but I thought this is why the cars are 42m in the first place - you can fit two of them on a N-S block when (lol, I mean if) this thing ever goes up Centre St.The north south blocks are relatively short at about 80m. The trains that are ordered are 42m per car. Not a huge deal to shrink them, but they will shrink by more than 2m, being modular and all, unless we fund the development of a shrunken module.
During the height of the public bickering, the Green Line still only claimed that each month of delay added $1.5M to the capital costs, not the $100+M we have seen.
The city accumulates additional reserves most years, and does not 'prebook' projections of outside contributions into reserves.So as I see it there's not much left for anything else (fieldhouse, is the rest of Arts Commons and Stephen Ave funded?), let alone funding for extensions.
Looking at the Google maps of Highfield, it's a pretty small plot and probably can't maintain and store much more than the dozen or so cars they only need for the new Stage 1.I'm just watching the council meeting. Sounds like there will still be an additional storage and maintenance facility required at Shephard eventually. Which doesn't sound terribly efficient.
I guess I also wonder if we should just relax for a bit. Work on keeping the lights on and maintenance (that pipe will probably continually be an issue). City building never stops but personally I kind of feel like we're a bit out over our skis fiscally. I don't feel like people are really calling for anymore city shaping projects. And like I said I don't actually think any project like that is just sitting there waiting. The province looks like it is going to take the regional and provincial rail thing on so that shouldn't burden the city.The city accumulates additional reserves most years, and does not 'prebook' projections of outside contributions into reserves.
There is also, you know, raising revenue to pay for things, as the city portion of the Green Line already is.
Should start this fall with things picking up in the 2025 construction season according to the green line board chairDo we know when construction starts?
The point isn't a comparison like-for-like of service, otherwise, I would have included the hundreds of billions of dollars of road infrastructure and the additional billions per year in maintenance and the additional billions per year in ecological destruction, and the additional billions per year in supplementary infrastructure that cost more due to sprawl, and the additional billions in healthcare costs and so on to go with the 3million passenger trips.But that's for over 3 million passenger-trips a day, enabling travel to all parts of the city and even beyond. Green Line Stage 1 will be lucky to get the claimed 32K trips/day and will have little to no benefit to 95% of the population.