Reminds me of a modern take on the classic "arms" style apartments of Montreal, New York or Chicago from the 1920 - 1950s era:
  • Density brought forward to the property line
  • Pedestrian-centric approach and landscaping (as opposed to random tower + boring lawn of the 1980s, and no landscaping as other recent buildings)
  • Narrow (by today's standards) cut-outs for air and light circulation
  • Minimal setbacks on the sides
  • 6 storeys
Love it. Once built - and about 50 years go by - whatever material choices they make will be hidden behind those trees so it's all good.
 
Surrealplaces said:
It's no Annex or Lido, but it's solid. With all the retail nearby, I'm not concerned there's not retail.
Click to expand...
Depends on the materials. If using the metal panels and vinyl trim etc.. ie Giordano , it'll be solid enough. Nicer materials and it could be a Lido or Annex. The overall massing and scale is good.
 
zagox said:
Don't worry there's still time to add some before the DP comes out. Also 6-7 more colours and some fins, louvres, and a spoiler.
Click to expand...

I'm dying. o_O🤣
 
The land use for this one goes to CPC next week:
Planning report: https://pub-calgary.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=167344
Applicant outreach: https://pub-calgary.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=167347
Proposed DC: https://pub-calgary.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=167348
CA Response: https://pub-calgary.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=167350
DP summary: https://pub-calgary.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=167351
1623450458620.png

1623450473104.png
 
 
BKha said:
Glad to see this one still in play. It'll compliment Theodore nicely.
Click to expand...

From the CA letter: "The applicant indicated that there will be a 1:1 parking to unit ratio. We note that parking stalls in the proposed M-U1 district can be relaxed and allow for a .75 stall per residential unit ratio. A combination of alternative transportation and local amenities can help reduce the need for automobile ownership and mitigate the impacts of more vehicles in a densifying neighbourhood."

HSCA has been frustrating on urbanization issues at times but it's nice to see a CA advocate for FEWER car parking spots for a change.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top