Yep.They were on the site briefly, but iirc the developer had asked to take them off.
Yep.They were on the site briefly, but iirc the developer had asked to take them off.
The previous renders were far less quality then these ones and a lot more conceptual. The scale was similar though.Where can we see the previous renderings?
Pitchforks will be selling like hotcakes this weekend lol.It's a pretty large scale for Marda Loop and sure there will be complaints from community members. Personally I like it, and if you're goin g to build a couple of taller buildings in Marda Loop, this is the location to do it.
Go big, go flashy at full strength - whatever they proposed would have been opposed might as well put full effort in.Pitchforks will be selling like hotcakes this weekend lol.
I think the development team will have a presence at Mardas Gras this weekend. If you are attending, give them a visit and feedback (good or bad).Pitchforks will be selling like hotcakes this weekend lol.
I'm wondering what Marda Gras will be like this year given that 33rd is completely ripped up. Guessing it will be toned down somewhat.I think the development team will have a presence at Mardas Gras this weekend. If you are attending, give them a visit and feedback (good or bad).
Marda Gras is full scale on Sunday. And Marc and Mada "engagement centre" will be open.I'm wondering what Marda Gras will be like this year given that 33rd is completely ripped up. Guessing it will be toned down somewhat.
Swung by Marda Gras this morning. Was the same as usual, albeit a little narrow between 19th and 20th street with the North side ripped up.Marda Gras is full scale on Sunday. And Marc and Mada "engagement centre" will be open.
They (the development team) said it won’t be completed as part of Main Streets because they don’t want to waste taxpayer money (i.e., the developer will pay to complete it). My argument to them was “well what happens if the developer doesn’t get funding, or the market changes, and this project gets delayed”, and their response was that “then the City would come back”.Does that mean that those sidewalks will not be completed as a part of the Main Streets project? Or are they being completed and then promptly ripped up again?
In this case the developer should have to put a bond down for the cost of the sidewalks.They (the development team) said it won’t be completed as part of Main Streets because they don’t want to waste taxpayer money (i.e., the developer will pay to complete it). My argument to them was “well what happens if the developer doesn’t get funding, or the market changes, and this project gets delayed”, and their response was that “then the City would come back”.
I don’t love it. I’d prefer the City complete the work and it get repaired, because I just think the risk of it not getting completed for 3-5 years is not worth the taxpayer savings.