Morshed
Active Member
how come the DP Map/ website does not show the height or number of floors for any development! that would be helpful
I would love it, if it were like Vancouver where they have those details, plus the renderings.how come the DP Map/ website does not show the height or number of floors for any development! that would be helpful
Yeah, the same thing in Toronto, the on site development proposal on a board usually shows the height in meters and floors count.I would love it, if it were like Vancouver where they have those details, plus the renderings.
This exactly. Every major city has it's icons but it's the other 99% of buildings that are more important. Getting the basics right at a sustainable level of density is the main goal, especially for such a central site. As I have mentioned many times before - in the city centre it's increasingly not the buildings that are the issue, it's the public realm that goes with them + development rules that make good public realm more difficult.True people do gravitate to interesting places, but the main reason the commercial core empties out after work is the people who work there don't live there. That and there aren't many business open after hours.
It might be a boring building, but it's sitting right along the train tracks, so I'm not expect an architectural marvel here, and those 850 units helps put people in the core. I'm happy to see this going ahead.
True people do gravitate to interesting places, but the main reason the commercial core empties out after work is the people who work there don't live there. That and there aren't many business open after hours.
It might be a boring building, but it's sitting right along the train tracks, so I'm not expect an architectural marvel here, and those 850 units helps put people in the core. I'm happy to see this going ahead.
You are correct that simply adding density on a given street isn't automatically going to make it vibrant. There are super dense neighborhoods in cities all over the place that aren't vibrant. Not every street can be vibrant. This building could be beautiful, but it wouldn't make any difference to the vibrancy on the street. The vibrant streets in Calgary are all streets flanked by mid and low rise buildings, many of which are crap really, but the collection of good businesses make it vibrant. The point many are making is the 1200-1400 people who'll live in the buildings will help support vibrancy in other areas of the core that are more vibrant, and also the general vibrancy of the core.Actually my point has as much to do about the functionality of this block's design . It's about as boring as it can get. I've lived in some of the densest residential communities that wouldn't be considered vibrant so I will stand by adding 850 units and a few overvalued CRUs does not create urban vibrancy on it's own.
This building will stand for a very long time. It's important to consider it as more than just replacing a parking lot beside a rail corridor. The parking garages built 40 years weren't a big issue. Now they are planning eyesores as the city has grown and developed.
I gotta give it to u on that one, most developers in Calgary and various other cities do an extremely poor job on podiums hence adding to this general growing animosity towards high rises in an urban realm. Place 10 is a perfect example of a beautiful building but a horrible retail podium. Can't even distinguish between the retail bays and the top floors. On top of that the heavy tint makes it even worse for shoppers and diners to window shop.There is no excuse for a poorly designed podium. Developers in this city seemed trapped in the mindset that podiums need to be sleek and elegant, with mininmal signage and ability for retailers to customize their storefront. Look at the Centron development across the street from Place 10: a wall of reflective glass with a few small signs to indicate to passersby that there are actually businesses present.