innsertnamehere
Superstar
It would be tweaked at a minimum to match the legislative maximums for IZ implemented in the Planning Act which were well below the City's standards set out in most of the PMTSA OPAs.
Correction on some of those site-counts.All 120 PMSTAs approved.
Inclusionary zoning remains.
Ontario Newsroom
news.ontario.ca
From the above:
View attachment 673701
View attachment 673704
****
Waiting on a backgrounder to see if the proving tweaked anything.
Correction on some of those site-counts.
Decision summary
A decision was made on August 15th, 2025, to modify and approve (in part), the City of Toronto Official Plan Amendment 570, as adopted by By-law 889-2022.
A decision has been withheld on part of the amendment.
The approved Official Plan Amendment 570 establishes forty-nine (49) protected major transit station areas.
A decision was withheld by the Minister on the following protected major transit station areas:
1.) East Harbour
2.) Gerrard-Carlaw
3.) Scarborough Centre
4.) Yonge-Steeles
5.) Guildwood
6.) Long Branch
7.) Scarborough GO
8.) Exhibition
Source LINK - https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-5937
This is inherently the problem with IZ. It is "paid for" by the other owners in the building.The Planning Committee is discussing inclusionary zoning today https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PH24.3
Though I instinctively like the idea of a minimum % of 'affordable units' in all developments, I can see how it would work in a rental development but can someone explain how this works in a condo? I assume the initial purchase price is 'reduced' but how is this guaranteed for 25 years if/when the initial owner sells and does being an owner of an 'affordable unit' provide any protection against high condo maintenance fee increases or of Special Assessments? The operations of Condo Corporations are based on the Condo Act and this sets out clearly how the Corporation's expenses to be paid for (x% per Unit, usually based on square footage). If up to 5% of Units in a condo corp are not being assessed 'their share', the other 95% of owners will need to pay more.




