nfitz
Superstar
Av. and not Av? That's inconsistent ...And in reference to the new street signs, I saw another that had Ave. as Av.
|
|
|
Av. and not Av? That's inconsistent ...And in reference to the new street signs, I saw another that had Ave. as Av.
and we can't afford it.
we've tried using "modren" flat aluminum acorn ones and people hated them too. that's the reason why we got this new one. Which is very nice.
What's being fixed is the cost and trying to create a city wide standard for logistical purposes. There will always be special signs, but having dozens of sign types has to be a nightmare for purchasing and planning.egotrippin said:These signs are a case of answering a question nobody asked; or fixing something that doesn't need to be fixed. The traditional acorn signs are great, unpretentious, and functional. The new signs try too hard so to speak, are busy with obnoxious fonts, and are just plain obtrusive. They'll only work in wide open windswept suburban streets, and still, even the suburbs deserve better design than these new signs.
This is a very important question, actually, and was probably one of the largest factors in the decision making process. $300 is an obscene number for these signs if they were in fact made in house and there wasn't one or two layers of markup on them. If someone was being obstinate about them, perhaps it was yanked away to avoid the acorns altogether and seek a new supplier. These signs aren't exactly $the $49 jobbies either but based on a contract of many pieces over a period of years, they're likely less than half of that $300 number.Northern Light said:Yes the old signs are about $300.00 each (manufactured in house).... there is always a question as to what they would cost if we tendered them...........
Of course it's an issue. This city continually makes decisions that put it further into deficit. The total dollars are not that large - as you have detailed - but there are hundreds (or thousands) of similar decisions that have to be made within a city's budget and added together, we're talking hundreds of millions.Northern Light said:Money is not an issue, quality and aesthetic value are!
And funnily enough I don't see that other cities all have to have cheap crappy street signs. Including many small towns in Ontario.
There seems to be a pre-occupation at City Hall with conforming standards applied throughout the city for everything. In some cases (certain bylaws, perhaps) this may make sense but in the case of street signs, I just don't understand why they'd paint the whole town the same.
Also noticed on Google Maps, First Ave. in East end (Gerrard and Broadview) became 1st Ave.
Technology really is our friend?