ssiguy2
Senior Member
Even if the stations have to be lengthened or widened, that can be done underground with no disruption to the hectiv Yonge/Queen intersection. It would still be a cheaper and far, far, far less disruptive procedure than building a brand new one from scratch under PATH and having an eaiser set up at Osgood is also a added money and time saving bonus.
That aside, I still think Queen should be a heavy favorite and the only option if they do not use the current Union rail corridor.
I think there is one thing that everyone on the site would agree upon, and that would be a first, is that for a DRL report to not even consider Queen is gross incompetence. Whether you support a Queen/Richmond line or not, not considering it makes the report look jeuvenille and afront to the taxpayers of Toronto for a $3 million public relations stunt.
That aside, I still think Queen should be a heavy favorite and the only option if they do not use the current Union rail corridor.
I think there is one thing that everyone on the site would agree upon, and that would be a first, is that for a DRL report to not even consider Queen is gross incompetence. Whether you support a Queen/Richmond line or not, not considering it makes the report look jeuvenille and afront to the taxpayers of Toronto for a $3 million public relations stunt.