nfitz
Superstar
If they keep running over pedestrians and wheelchairs, their insurers will impose requirements.Probably not going to find a lot of buy in from retailers to overhaul their transport fleet though.
|
|
|
If they keep running over pedestrians and wheelchairs, their insurers will impose requirements.Probably not going to find a lot of buy in from retailers to overhaul their transport fleet though.
I would gently push back on the idea that drivers know or remember to check for bikes when opening their door. I don't have any stats at hand, but anecdotally I've heard many stories of driver-side dooring. There is a private member's bill to teach the Dutch Reach during driver training, though even if it passes, there will of course be many drivers who learned years ago and aren't familiar with it for decades to come. And of course most cars also have a passenger door on the driver's side, so it's entirely possible to be doored by a clueless passenger on either side.The argument is that drivers have to check for traffic no matter what (bike or car), while passengers often don't look because there is no oncoming vehicle traffic on their side. I'd be curious to know, statistically, what side has more incidents of dooring? Anecdotally, I've nearly been doored twice, and both times were between the car and the curb with a passenger exiting their vehicle.
No doubt, I agree with you here, I was merely articulating the argument being made -- That they are more likely to check due to the fear of being hit by a car than a passenger who assumes safety. Wether thats true or not I don't know. I would be curious to see what the stats are.I've heard many stories of driver-side dooring
Probably not going to find a lot of buy in from retailers to overhaul their transport fleet though.
It is pretty standard that retailers need to use smaller equipment to deliver to many parts of Toronto.Probably not going to find a lot of buy in from retailers to overhaul their transport fleet though.
Yup. Most suburban retailers are serviced by full size 53ft trailers, while downtown they use smaller 20ft trucks. That's because it's almost literally impossible to navigate the inner city in a 53ft truck though. I've seen those trucks try to make turns downtown a few times before and they have to block the whole intersection to do it and it takes a solid minute or two to do it. Doesn't work.It is pretty standard that retailers need to use smaller equipment to deliver to many parts of Toronto.
Wasn't the rational that the light levels were set to mimic the levels outside so drivers eyes didn't have to adjust as much?
Did you try reporting this to 311 or the Toronto Hydro Steetlighting website? (https://www.torontohydro.com/for-home/report-a-streetlight-out ) Lights under bridges tend to be a CITY responsibility but ......When this underpass opened, both sides of the tunnel were lined with likely 100 LED lamps. It was actually pretty ridiculous how many were installed. Even with only half of them turned on, it was like staring into the sun, and it remained that way for years. In the last couple of months however I've noticed that only a tiny amount remain lit, perhaps less than 10 on each side, making it quite dark. Is this another classic case of city hall spending big money to build infrastructure and then pretending it doesn't exist? They've let the artwork adorning the walls go to hell too.
Did you try reporting this to 311 or the Toronto Hydro Steetlighting website? (https://www.torontohydro.com/for-home/report-a-streetlight-out ) Lights under bridges tend to be a CITY responsibility but ......
While I realise that neither the City nor Hydro may actually DO something, if you report this apparent problem to them, if you think that the lighting is a problem and actually want it fixed, it makes little sense to tell UTers about it as we are certainly not going to fix things.I haven't, no. Diffusion of responsibility and all that.