dunno
Active Member
Can't believe this is the prettiest this development will ever look
- Thread starter Daveography
- Start date
IanO
Superstar
Sadly, very little innovation or evolution over the years...
dunno
Active Member
Langham is basically responsible for half of 104th Street at this point and they've produced some heinous eyesores in the process. At least on podium-level, Icons are ok. As much as this lot has potential to "extend" 104 south of Jasper more with engaging CRUs, based on the path the Fox podium has taken, I'm a little skeptical. 104th feels like a failure to launch, especially without the City Market.
IanO
Superstar
Aesthetically it's not great, but having been there to launch Icon I and II, it was a massive risk and has been transformational.
dunno
Active Member
Yeah, I remember the hype around the Icon towers. And it's been their most successful towers to date, which is saying a lot considering the forever eyesore they produced for Beaver Hills House Park.
IanO
Superstar
Lots to unpack there... but at least we avoided this, right?
dunno
Active Member
Why is the choice between bad and moderately less bad?
The Century is actually kind of similar to the Icons in that their podium is good and works well in the context of the street. The tower - much less so. But at least TNP had the wherewithal to consider the fact that buildings usually have more than 3 sides. The Century isn't anything to write home about, but I'd rather see that from 105th and Jasper than the absolute nothingness of bland white stucco and punched windows that are only broken up by the absolute afterthought of that curtainwall box at the top.
Aaron_Lloyd
Active Member
Honestly, at this point, I just wish they'd kept with the black stucco in the earlier renders... at least that wouldn't end up looking quite so dirty and gross 10 years down the line.
MCXavierL
Active Member
BP:
| 2023-06-06 |
| Commercial Final |
| To construct a 29 Storey Apartment building (240 Dwellings) with amenity space on level 02, General Retail on the main floor and 5 underground parking levels - Falcon Tower One. |
| $41,434,608 |
| 10027 - 104 STREET NW |
EdmTrekker
Senior Member
29:floors is a lot less than the 38 originally proposed. The unit numbers for Tower 1 have shrunk from 296 to 240 so a loss of 56 or 5.6 units per each of the 10 floors cut. And the 240 units is 8.275 units per floor based on 29 floors. They must have really shrunk the unit sizes. Maybe someone has a better grasp of what is happening with the reductions.
“Address 10019 104 Street NW, Edmonton, T5K 2X7
Category Residential, Commercial (Retail)
Status Under Construction
Number of Buildings 2
Height 558 ft / 170.00 m, 476 ft / 145.00 m
Storeys 38, 44
Number of Units 296, 356
Developer Langham Developments Limited
Architect Arc Studio, KENNEDY”
I wonder how much the second tower will be cut from the planned 44 as posted here.
“Address 10019 104 Street NW, Edmonton, T5K 2X7
Category Residential, Commercial (Retail)
Status Under Construction
Number of Buildings 2
Height 558 ft / 170.00 m, 476 ft / 145.00 m
Storeys 38, 44
Number of Units 296, 356
Developer Langham Developments Limited
Architect Arc Studio, KENNEDY”
I wonder how much the second tower will be cut from the planned 44 as posted here.
Tropical
Active Member
Having lived above the 20th and 30th floor of buildings, I don't see this as a loss (shoeboxes in the sky). 29 floors in this location is absolutely fine.
_urbanite
Senior Member
At 29 storeys it won't be as noticeable from certain angles in our skyline, which is a good thing in this case
yeggator
Active Member
Remind me, what is going to be the height of the under-construction tower? 110 meters?
Canadian 001
Active Member
98 meters
ChazYEG
Senior Member
Will someone put a flagpole on top to make it 100m tall, please? hahahaha