IanO
Superstar
Pass.
Give 'em hell, @TAS (and whoever else shows up)! I can't make it but I hope the people on this forum can overwhelm this town hall.
I did write a letter to Anne Stevenson expressing my full support for the gondola.
We met with ETS last week and we asked specifically that question: Are we taking jobs or revenue away from ETS? Are we replacing routes? They responded, "Absolutely not." We insisted, "Is there any indirect way that we are negatively impacting ETS?" Their response was that we didn't. They explained that when ARC is activated, anyone on the system will separately pay into it and the management is done through WIX, not ETS. They added that if they notice that one route becomes less busy, it will actually be beneficial to them as it will allow them to reallocate services and resources elsewhere or increase hours elsewhere. Their conclusion was, "Prairie sky Gondola being part of the system would help ETS become more responsive." These are ongoing conversations, but we thought you may appreciate some of thoughts we are all having and how we want to be able to support not compete with those on the network to the benefit of users.It’s not about protecting the River Valley. It’s about Janz objecting to any possible profit being made by the gondola, and taking away jobs from Edmonton Transit. Why don’t you object to the extension of the High Level streetcar?
Just a small correction, Arc is being done by Vix - Wix is the company that provides website templates! But thanks for sharing that conversation with ETS; it's great to know that your two organizations are in communication, and that they're receptive to your projectthe management is done through WIX, not ETS.