Das Ponto
Active Member
@archited Exactly my thoughts. I think a lot of people see Old Strathcona as being in a "perfect" state of vibrancy and turn-of-the-century charm that can't or doesn't need to be improved upon. But that kind of complacency, coupled with a (real or perceived) hostility to change and new development leads to valuable lands like this sitting empty, derelict, and abandoned.
No new units entering the market in a highly desirable location means it becomes more expensive for existing residents and out-of-reach for everyone else who wants to become part of it. That puts a lot of pressure on heritage buildings, too, as they become more valuable as redevelopment opportunities rather than maintained as they are, which in turn incentivizes dereliction and abandonment to justify replacing them.
You can't preserve the character of a neighbourhood by locking it in a time capsule. It has to be resilient to change and it has to grow to sustain itself. The best, most vibrant neighbourhoods I've visited in cities across the world are nearly always a mix of old and new, including short, medium, and tall. These things don't have to be in opposition to each other if we can find the right balance.
Low- and mid-rise developments like this that don't threaten any existing architectural heritage are exactly the balance we need in this area.
So true, look at some of the best places over in Van, Gas Town - old neighbourhood being revitalized with new infill projects and construction. Love that place and expect Whyte to be able to step up its level, its become fairly stagnant and needs some updating for sure.