I don't agree with massive increases either, but some increases would be good, and if done slowly and steadily without causing too much of an outcry it can be done. I'm not sure there's any way to slow down greenfield development other than to manage it and make that development pay more of its fair share. The city has done a decent job of increasing zoning densities in the inner city to allow higher density, and while the progress has been slower than many of us would like, it is at least happening. Having increases in development levies somehow go toward inner city development will help. Wouldn't solve the problem but it would help.The political reality is that there are two choices for edge suburb development:
1) Denser with mixed use nodes and some nod to transit - eg Seton
2) 70s-90s style single family dominated
The idea that Alberta would implement a Toronto/Portland style greenbelt and halt all edge growth is a fantasy. So are massive increases to development fees. Maybe Calgary could pull it off for a few years but I just don’t see a sustainable political coalition at city hall or at the provincial level to pull it off.
I think Nenshi has smartly seen that an “all of the above” approach where we try to do both the densification in the inner city and some densification of the edge suburbs is the best politically feasible outcome from an urban design point of view. He’s suffering from the cost consequences of that path now but I still agree with the strategy.