News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.4K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

How does that relate to anything? The "congestion" argument is just rationalization. If it wasn't that it would be something else that pits suburban drivers against people in the city who bike and walk around.

But I am curious. How do you, personally, balance the reduction in collisions and injuries from installation of bike lanes against potentially increased travel times for vehicles?
 

Toronto police cracking down on unsafe e-bike operators​


An education and enforcement campaign titled “Safe Streets, Safe Roads” began on Monday and will be in effect for the next two weeks until Sunday, Nov. 17, primarily in the downtown core.

Traffic officers will be pulling over those who are potentially breaking the law, including those who are speeding, running red lights, hopping on and off sidewalks, and not wearing a helmet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PL1
The "congestion" argument is just rationalization.
Rationalization of what? If there was not congestion related to bike lanes Ford would bounce to something else to complain about.
How do you, personally, balance the reduction in collisions and injuries from installation of bike lanes against potentially increased travel times for vehicles?
Personally I don’t, but professionally this would go to the actuaries. Those are the folks who will decide how many additional dead or injured cyclists are worth an extra few minutes saved for drivers.
 
Rationalization of what? If there was not congestion related to bike lanes Ford would bounce to something else to complain about.
Bike lanes are pure culture war. Not about congestion. You can tell about how gleeful Cory Teneycke was about going the NDP/Liberals into opposing the policy.
 

Back
Top