Forgotten
Active Member
8 messages later and no answers, lots of bla bla bla but no answers.
Is it any wonder cyclists are held in such low esteem by the general public?
That's because bicycle riders are children.
|
|
|
8 messages later and no answers, lots of bla bla bla but no answers.
Is it any wonder cyclists are held in such low esteem by the general public?
Please don't attribute this mindless conclusion to me - I never said all e-bike riders have DUI's, that was your inference. That would be ridiculous. What I did say, reiterating what others have said, is that e-bikes fill the unexpected niche of being the motorized mode of transport of choice for many who have had their licences pulled as a result of DUI's.
That's because bicycle riders are children.
Citation needed.
I saw a cyclist this week wearing a device that flashed a bright (LED?) light front and back. Cyclists would enjoy a better opinion in the eyes of the public if they all sported this technology for their sake and that of everyone else out and about after dark. The light was very bright almost impossible to miss and seemed to be attached to the cyclists middle body.
How many cyclists here use this device, if not why not?
8 messages later and no answers, lots of bla bla bla but no answers.
Is it any wonder cyclists are held in such low esteem by the general public?
I saw a cyclist this week wearing a device that flashed a bright (LED?) light front and back. Cyclists would enjoy a better opinion in the eyes of the public if they all sported this technology for their sake and that of everyone else out and about after dark. The light was very bright almost impossible to miss and seemed to be attached to the cyclists middle body.
How many cyclists here use this device, if not why not?
I also don't understand why anyone would ride with no lights at all, but I guess it's a combination of arrogance ('It's up to others to illuminate me') and obliviousness.
Or "I forgot to bring my lights today"
Or 'someone stole my lights' ...
Go check outside one of those man bars on Dundas west. You'll see lots of e-bikes. One of those is owned by a drunk that I had arrested and taken away in handcuffs, car impounded after he almost killed me on my human powered bike. There's your citation.
No, what's going on is Denzil Minnan-Wong is using ebikes as a convenient wedge issue, telling cyclists they have to be more accommodating if they want more bike infrastructure, knowing full well the tensions between them.
The College and Harbord bike lanes are certainly crowded enough as they are. More bike lanes will get more cyclists using them, it's not a matter of lowering the bar as to who can use them in the hope they become more utilized.[/QUOTE0]
The College lanes in particular are a great opportunity, precisely because they are so well used. Allow (or *gasp* encourage) people of all ages and abilities to use them on bike or scooter, and we would have a crisis with people splilling over into all the other lanes, making it blatantly obvious that the existing infrastructure is inadequate. We could then build some separate infrastructure without quibbling over whether we really need to devote 2.5m of road space per direction (compared to 1.5m currently) for bicycle infrastructure.
Any cyclist riding without good lights at night is a fool!
I agree, but I would have said "Any person riding a bicycle at night without lights...". These mythical "cyclist" beings are actually just ordinary people riding bicycles.
I was riding just after sunset in Holland many years ago and I couldn't get more than 50m without a fellow cyclist chastising me for being invisible. And I mean a good stern tongue licking. And they were right. I got some lights.
The difference in The Netherlands is that their bicycles come with lights standard (as well as fenders, reflectors, racks and bells).
If headlights, horns or seatbelts were not included standard in cars, I think you'd find a lot of people driving around without them as well.
The difference in The Netherlands is that their bicycles come with lights standard (as well as fenders, reflectors, racks and bells).
I agree. Ordinarily this term wouldn't be divisive, but descriptive, but in Toronto where many people are crazy (F'nation types - the ones who despise people on bikes for no reason), there is, I hope, a process underway wherein 'bicycle riding pinkos' will eventually be humanized instead of demonized.I agree, but I would have said "Any person riding a bicycle at night without lights...". These mythical "cyclist" beings are actually just ordinary people riding bicycles.
The difference in The Netherlands is that their bicycles come with lights standard (as well as fenders, reflectors, racks and bells).
If headlights, horns or seatbelts were not included standard in cars, I think you'd find a lot of people driving around without them as well.