News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.1K     0 

Status
Not open for further replies.

wyliepoon

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
3
Link to article


Calgary tops list of Canadian cities
Research organization warns ability of urban centres to attract 'best and brightest' may be in jeopardy

CAROLINE ALPHONSO

From Wednesday's Globe and Mail

December 12, 2007 at 5:00 AM EST

TORONTO — The lure of a red-hot economy has attracted thousands to Calgary and made it the most attractive city in Canada, a new study concludes.

Toronto and Vancouver finished second and third, respectively, in the Conference Board of Canada report to be released this morning. It ranks the country's large metropolitan areas for the first time based on economy, health, society, housing, environment, innovation and education.

Alongside the ranking, the report issues a stark warning: Cash-strapped cities need more money from Ottawa and provincial governments or they will fail in the global competition to attract talent.

"Cities without the ability to act as magnets and attract new people will struggle to stay prosperous," says the report, titled City Magnets: Benchmarking the Attractiveness of Canada's CMAs [census metropolitan areas].

To rank Canada's 27 cities with a population over 100,000 (based on the 2001 census), the board compiled data for each of the seven categories, and assigned explicit weights to each. Under health, for example, it looked at the number of doctors per 100,000 people.

Calgary earned an A or B grade across all seven categories. Even in housing, it received an A because high incomes mean homeowners have fewer affordability problems than those in Vancouver and Toronto, the board found.

The Conference Board also compared Canadian cities to 27 in the United States, again using the seven categories. Cities from all regions of the United States were analyzed, but there was a particular interest in border cities and those with economic ties to Canada. Calgary finished third behind Washington and Austin, Tex., in this aggregate ranking. No other Canadian city ranked in the top 10.

Some of the weakest performers among Canadian cities were in Ontario and Quebec, where a struggling manufacturing sector has caused economic headaches. Thunder Bay, hit hard by no employment growth and very low income growth, ranked at the bottom of the list.

The report called on federal and provincial governments to help cities such as Thunder Bay and Windsor, Ont., recover from a manufacturing downturn. Vancouver, too, needs help addressing its housing needs, especially because the average homeowner devotes 42 per cent of his or her income to mortgage payments - twice as much as the average Calgarian, the board said.

Anne Golden, the board's president and chief executive, said in an interview yesterday that cities don't have the resources to address the economic challenges and social responsibilities facing them.

The credentials of highly educated immigrants are not being recognized, and their failure to achieve earning parity with their Canadian-born colleagues is "a collective failure of business and all levels of government, not the cities' alone," the report states.

Ms. Golden said Canadian cities are competing with others around the world for talent to address a looming labour shortage.

"Our cities have to be able to attract the best and brightest from around the world," she said. "You're seeing cities struggling. You're seeing cities underinfrastructured and underperforming. It is cities competing against cities in a global economy right now."

City rankings

Rankings of metropolitan areas and overall grades from the Conference Board of Canada. The board compares the performance of 27 Canadian cities in seven different categories: economy, innovation, environment, education, health, society and housing. It also then compared Canadian cities with U.S. cities.

Canadian cities
Rank City Grade
1 Calgary A
2 Toronto A
3 Vancouver A
4 Edmonton A
5 Victoria A
6 Ottawa-Gatineau A
7 Halifax B
8 Oshawa, Ont. B
9 Kitchener, Ont. B
10 Abbotsford, B.C. B
11 Quebec City B
12 Sherbrooke B
13 Saskatoon B
14 Montreal B
15 Hamilton B
16 St. John's B
17 Regina B
18 London, Ont. C
19 Winnipeg C
20 Kingston C
21 Sudbury C
22 Trois-Rivières C
23 Windsor, Ont. C
24 St. Catharines-Niagara C
25 Saguenay, Que. D
26 Saint John D
27 Thunder Bay D

Canadian and U.S. cities
Rank City Grade
1 Washington A
2 Austin, Tex. A
3 Calgary A
4 New York B
5 San Jose, Calif. B
6 Boston B
7 Houston B
8 San Francisco B
9 Denver B
10 Orlando B
11 Edmonton B
12 Dallas B
13 Seattle B
14 Portland, Ore. B
15 Toronto B
16 Vancouver B
17 Atlanta B
18 Ottawa-Gatineau B
19 Minneapolis, Minn. B
20 Nashville B
21 Victoria B
22 San Diego B
23 Columbus B
24 Hartford, Conn. C
25 Chicago C
26 Quebec City C
27 Los Angeles C
 
still shows were still quite office orientated..
 
It is the cities that are most important in the globalizing world being hubs of sorts for immigration, trade and finance. Cities ought to receive more attention from the federal government, even if currently it's the province that is supposed to take care of these issues.

On the plus side we still beat out Montreal :cool:.
 
Sham

There just seem to be more and more of these rankings, I think because they are popular, easy to understanding, and guarantee some press coverage for the organization sponsoring the survey. Here's one I'd like to see, the UrbanToronto Canadian cities on Torontonianess. We'd come out first every time!
 
Those lists look pretty dubious to me. In the Canadian survey Toronto comes out ahead of Edmonton, but in the North American list Toronto drops behind The City of Champions. What gives? Also why does Toronto carry an A in one list and a B in the other? Also, also why are the most "attractive" cities located in oil rich areas (Texas and Alberta)? And how does Vancouver, which is almost always in the top 3 of the yearly international Quality of Life surveys, drop to 16th in a North America list? The methodology of this survey needs some serious 'splaining.
 
The same manatees that write for Family Guy?

1004_manatee_tank.jpg
 
While I have no qualms about Toronto not being first (it definately does not deserve to be), I can't help but think what were the categories and how were they rated?
 
^ I already told you...the categories and rankings were selected by manatees! See 299's post above for a picture of the think tank that did the study.
 
First off, there is no way that it could be selected by manatees.

This is because Calgary and Alberta is now synonymous with pollution. Added to the fact that manatees are gentle creatures of the sea (there just should not be enough of them in "think tanks") and the majority would probably have voted some Nova Scotia or Victoria (coastal) city.

Now if the panel selection was made by people like in the accompanying picture, I would wholeheartdly agree.
 

Attachments

  • 29565-rich-texan_400.jpg
    29565-rich-texan_400.jpg
    10.7 KB · Views: 133
^Victoria dumps its sewage untreated into the sea, so the manatees aren't doing their homework.

My understanding of these rankings is that they look at things like the concentration of professionals who tuck their golf shirts into their Dockers, and whether or not your city has a "technology triangle". Things like Victorian rowhouses, a lack of parking and a prevalence of gay people kind of lower the ratings a bit, as does the "threat of terrorism".
 
Things like Victorian rowhouses, a lack of parking and a prevalence of gay people kind of lower the ratings a bit, as does the "threat of terrorism".

Maybe it isn't so much the easy-homophobia of a raw "prevalence of gay people", as much as the Richard Floridaness of said gay people making things more "cultural" and therefore less "affordable".

Remember: it was the "affordability" factor that put Calgary up on top. When it came to cultural questions, though, Toronto was well ahead...
 
Now I like manatees - they're quiet, gentle, and they've had a hard time of it ever since humans invaded their slow-moving Florida rivers with outboard motors - but they should not be authoring reports on the livability of cities, an area where they are obviously out of their depth. That said, it's time to sink this thread to where it belongs, at the bottom of this pool.

42
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top