torontocolin
Active Member
They say Lansdowne to Dundas, but presumably they mean Lansdowne to Bloor or Keele? Lansdowne to Dundas is not very far, and the space for a fourth Kitchener track was already set aside in that part of the corridor.
|
|
|
They say Lansdowne to Dundas, but presumably they mean Lansdowne to Bloor or Keele? Lansdowne to Dundas is not very far, and the space for a fourth Kitchener track was already set aside in that part of the corridor.
An interesting read - the good news is, ML actually working on adding track on the Guelph Sub, the not so good news is, another mayor discovers how ML handles community outreach....
Metrolinx requesting access to local properties for GO line expansion studies
ROCKWOOD – A Metrolinx plan for a second set of train tracks in the Kitchener GO Transit corridor has Guelph-Eramosa council and local landowners looking for more information before they grant consent for preliminary studies. Metrolinx is currently asking permission to access private and public...www.wellingtonadvertiser.com
- Paul
Can't decide whether I'm more annoyed with the NIMBYs, or Metrolinx's non-existent effort in community outreach.
I was handed a little crow to eat with my Thanksgiving turkey this year - after venting about how the Hamilton Jct interlocking is a long ways from getting reworked to enable increased Hamilton service, CN actually started making changes last weekend and (I'm told) will continue with the work over the fall. So far, a couple of switches have been moved further north, which creates just enough room to squeeze in some new turnouts to re-attach one of the two connecting tracks to the CP line to Hunter Street. If you refer back to message 5668 in this thread, you can sort of see the difference.
If work stays on track to the New Year (always a big "if" with this sort of construction), the new track from West Harbour to Bayview will be complete, and the chokepoint between CN freight and GO movements will have been mitigated, which brings 2WAD service all that much closer. It's a complicated task..... good to see ML finally found the money and the sense of urgency for this work, after several years' worth of kicking stones.
- Paul
View attachment 210401
Silly question, I'm sure, but I apparently need to learn something............what's with that bizarre-looking (to me) alignment for that connecting track with the 2 distinct curves on its way over?
I was handed a little crow to eat with my Thanksgiving turkey this year - after venting about how the Hamilton Jct interlocking is a long ways from getting reworked to enable increased Hamilton service, CN actually started making changes last weekend and (I'm told) will continue with the work over the fall. So far, a couple of switches have been moved further north, which creates just enough room to squeeze in some new turnouts to re-attach one of the two connecting tracks to the CP line to Hunter Street. If you refer back to message 5668 in this thread, you can sort of see the difference.
If work stays on track to the New Year (always a big "if" with this sort of construction), the new track from West Harbour to Bayview will be complete, and the chokepoint between CN freight and GO movements will have been mitigated, which brings 2WAD service all that much closer. It's a complicated task..... good to see ML finally found the money and the sense of urgency for this work, after several years' worth of kicking stones.
- Paul
View attachment 210401