steveintoronto
Superstar
There's a lot more discussion both directions to be had on this, and a very real danger of the public getting muddled between H internal combustion engines, and H fuel-cell electric locomotives.Correct, but then again you can call it green in the context of localized emissions. The more problematical thing is why are we trying to adopt technologies that have no track record of reliability or success so far?
AoD
The Green Agenda hasn't helped by overstating the practicability at this time, let alone carbon offset, and that will be discussed further, but the bottom line to Alvin's point is:
*We've been here before!* I don't have time to Google, will later, but this is revisiting the 'Nuclear surplus electricity being used for hydrolysis to power GO's locomotive fleet' from what, twenty, thirty years back?
H storage is a minefield (with the full intent of the word) in itself. Yes, the newest developments *must* be studied....but this was an announcement purely for the sake of political gain...real or otherwise.
Last edited: