News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
 9.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
 5.4K     0 

chrisw said:
The Fare Integration Initial Business Case was mistakenly posted for a bit. Some excerpts posted in this Twitter thread.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1753171036508414293
Click to expand...
Here is a drive link to a pdf of the IBC

Many thanks to @JackTattTran for downloading it originally before Metrolinx got rid of it.

Metrolinx_Regional_Fare_Structure_IBC.pdf

drive.google.com drive.google.com

Edit: Here is a link to the archived pdf https://web.archive.org/web/2024020...ges/Metrolinx/Regional_Fare_Structure_IBC.pdf
 
Last edited:
MrGoose said:
Here is a drive link to a pdf of the IBC

Many thanks to @JackTattTran for downloading it originally before Metrolinx got rid of it.

Metrolinx_Regional_Fare_Structure_IBC.pdf

drive.google.com drive.google.com
Click to expand...

Good on you, I was going to post this myself, but had to acquire it again........for obvious reasons.............

Also wanted to finish reading it so I could post it w/comments..............those are coming.

But thanks (genuine)
 
Wait - they’re really projecting an extra 300k customers daily with GO Expansion? That’s…over double the current daily weekday ridership, no?

I mean, I am very much in favour of GO expansion, and am rooting for GO to solidly become far more than a commuter service, but that projection is wild.
 
MrGoose said:
Here is a link to the archived pdf https://web.archive.org/web/2024020...ges/Metrolinx/Regional_Fare_Structure_IBC.pdf
Click to expand...

From the above, I'm going to extract some bits for everyone. But I would encourage those interested to at least save the actual document for future reading.

1706877504602.png

1706877584453.png

1706877619527.png

1706877658633.png


1706877817496.png


1706877914295.png

1706878056612.png


1706878114181.png

1706878150707.png


1706878179240.png

1706878292218.png


1706878402171.png


There ya GO UT; happy reading. (I'm out of room for images in this post!)
 
allengeorge said:
Wait - they’re really projecting an extra 300k customers daily with GO Expansion? That’s…over double the current daily weekday ridership, no?
Click to expand...

In 2018, yes, they were projecting more than doubling GO ridership as GO Expansion rolled out. The 2055 ridership was projected at just over 600k trips per day. Toronto Union and NY Penn will be battling for #1 busiest station in North America (including subway ridership at both: Toronto nearly wins today based strictly on commuter rail ridership).

Screenshot from 2024-02-02 10-13-23.png
 
stevemunro.ca

The Vanishing Business Case for Regional Fare Structure

Anyone who deals with Metrolinx from the outside knows that getting information can be a real struggle, but every so often the veil of secrecy lifts, although not always intentionally. The implemen…
stevemunro.ca stevemunro.ca

Steve Munroe is quite critical of the Initial Business Case. Variation B,C,D are quite capital expensive by requiring tap off on the subway, charging more for regional subway riders.

Many of the benefits can be achieved by just reforming GO Fares and fixing the problems with GO Fares.
 
^ excuse my if ignorance and I haven't had a chance to look through in detail but didn't the IBC talk about several variants? Which one did they go with?
 
Allandale25 said:
^ excuse my if ignorance and I haven't had a chance to look through in detail but didn't the IBC talk about several variants? Which one did they go with?
Click to expand...
So its basically an expansion of the existing system in the 905, where GO fares supercede all fares, and transfer periods between local agencies are honoured. This does mean that making a trip between agencies does have different costs depending on the direction (so travelling from York to Toronto will cost 3.85 meanwhile travelling from Toronto to York will cost 3.30), but overall its a large improvement.
 
This is amazing to see. Never thought I'd see the day.

One thing that will be interesting to see over the next year or two is how these changes affect operations for cross-border transit. I would think that (for example) several YRT routes will see increases in ridership (along with accompanying drops for TTC routes) and maybe things like those cross - Steeles TTC buses get redistributed.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top