Yep. From the North side it looks very much like a huge c. 1950s tenement. Not surprising given the developer and architect.
I just can't see what is so terrible about the building. True, the complex is quite large, but it seems to fit within the area quite nicely. I thought that especially the front looked quite nice, leading into the residential area. It would be much easier to to fit in a smaller building. The problem with the north side is that because of the stupid NRT demands, there cannot be any balconies or proper windows, and it could not be resolved otherwise.
If you take a look at downtown Toronto, there are old and new structures side by side, and I think it's pretty cool It may take some getting used to the idea of a tall building where there used to be none, but I think it will work out well eventually. Especially when all the landscaping is finished.
And about the project being "cost effective". With other developments, you pay for marketing costs, model suites, pools, etc. Options decided to do without all this. I lived in a building with a nice pool, but never used it because the chlorine was bothering me too much. So why pay for it? Anyway, what is wrong with Deltera? I heard horror stories from friends who moved into new condos, but none of them was built by Deltera.
Many of us bought into the project because we like the Options' concept, the idea of a green building, and it does not hurt to get a suite 50% lbigger than most of the other developers would offer at the same cost. I'd rather put my money elsewhere than into out-of-control overpriced real estate that can't go anywhere but down anyway.
All right - enough of the ramble...
It's been just on my mind.