dunkalunk
Senior Member
And that's a good thing? I'm going to risk starting a big debate by uttering these words: "bedroom communities".
Toronto will become a bedroom community of Kitchener *gasp*
Last edited:
|
|
|
And that's a good thing? I'm going to risk starting a big debate by uttering these words: "bedroom communities".
Okay, so let's do a cost-benefit analysis on HSR vs upgraded regional rail and see which wins. We aren't going to get that because this is a typical Ontario Liberal vote-buying scheme. I could see this making sense if there was all day GO service between Kitchener/Pearson/Toronto that was overloaded, but we are so far away from that! It makes no sense.
If you see how downtown Kitchener and Waterloo Region as a whole are rapidly transforming with tech companies, both new and established, you might think differently about whether the knowledge economy is an empty buzzword. In a region like Southwestern Ontario that has been driven for the last century to a large extent by manufacturing, a shift in local economies in the direction of tech-heavy jobs is a big deal.
Who says they aren't building regional rail either? They have been fairly specific that they are building both.
And you should expect 15 minute trains without even having to move!
Looking forward to seeing more details in the budget tomorrow, especially how this all will be funded. IF a concrete funding plan is laid out, I am really optimistic about the future of transit in Ontario.... if the budget is passed. Would be a shame to see the fastest high speed rail and 15 min express service flushed. We are so close.
The way pols like Glen Murray use the term though is as a self-obvious justification for their own (questionable) policies and to piggyback on the aura of prestige and progressiveness companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google and such have in this day and age. Instead of actual metrics of project benefits and cost (ridership, operating costs, capital costs, diversions ect..) it's about the "knowledge economy" and how cool that is.
If there was any kind of obvious travel market between London-KW-YYZ-Union this entire announcement wouldn't seem so out-of-left field. The markets are very, very thin, though.
I know the announcement said that....within 10 years (although this HSR seems to be coming in 6 - 8 years)....but my point was that it seems strange to see so many people supporting, on a commuter basis, this much expenditure encouraging daily London-KW-Toronto commuting (ie. longer commutes in time and distance) compared to what my own personal experience has been advocating for even less service for a larger and closer city......in other words I was just musing.
Considering it's $40 dollars a ticket, this service doesn't seem to be for daily commuters. I would've thought it's more for occasional travel and to get to the airport? Not sure if there's enough ridership to for trains every 30 min though...
Brampton should rebrand itself as "Canada's innovation capital: home of digital solutions network incubators" and just wait for the HSR stations.
The 401 and 403 must not have very much traffic, I guess.
mpd618 said:As for metrics, I think any list of "actual metrics" should include some measure of economic and land-use impact.