News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.4K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

wyliepoon

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
3
What a surprise! A city with one of the highest population densities in the world and an efficient public transport network actually has a higher carbon footprint per capita than the United States...

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ge_d3dkncy0tJ9T05_eo7vwRjwHQ

Hong Kong's carbon footprint 'second highest in world'

(AFP) – 15 hours ago

HONG KONG — Hong Kong has the second highest carbon footprint per capita in the world, due to the city's high consumption patterns and large volume of imports, according to a survey released in Norway.

The study, conducted by a group of Norway-based scientists, compared the greenhouse emissions of 73 economies and found Hong Kong with a per capita footprint of 29 tonnes per year, second only to Luxembourg's 33 tonnes.

The results prompted calls for Hong Kong, a city of seven million, to strengthen measures to cut its greenhouse gas emissions.

Titled "Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-linked Analysis", the research paper was published in the Environmental Sciences and Technology Journal in June. But the results did not come to the public's attention until they were reported by the daily South China Morning Post on Monday.

Using global data from 2001, the study put Hong Kong's carbon footprint among the highest, larger than the United States' 28.6 tonnes, Singapore's 24.1 tonnes and United Kingdom's 15.4.

Most of the environmental impact comes from the manufacturing and transportation of imported goods, with only 17 per cent of emissions from domestic activities.

The figure is significantly higher than one released by the Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department -- 6.7 tonnes per capita -- which took into account local emissions, such as from transport and power generation, but excludes emissions from the production of imported goods.

A spokeswoman for the Environmental Protection Department declined to comment on the statistics but said the government abides by international guidelines on greenhouse gas emissions.

Bill Barron, a professor from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology's Institute for the Environment, said the government needs to tackle the problem.

"Hong Kong is an economy that is extremely dependent on trade. Therefore the city is tied to the ecological footprints that these imports make," Barron said.

He added that the government is avoiding its responsibility to reduce greenhouse emissions.

Pollution has become an increasing health and economic problem for the financial hub in recent years.

Emissions from the southern Chinese factory belt over Hong Kong's northern border have combined with local emissions from power generators and transport to park a thick haze over the city for most of the year.
 
What a surprise! A city with one of the highest population densities in the world and an efficient public transport network actually has a higher carbon footprint per capita than the United States...
It's not that surprising actually, since the factors you pointed out only contributes to 17% of the footprint. HK may have an efficient urban infrastructure, but it's been well criticized as a highly consumerist and wasteful society.
 
Does this include all the shipping that goes through its port? If so, that's not really fair...
 
Does this include all the shipping that goes through its port? If so, that's not really fair...
Not through, just into. This is actually one factor that disadvantages smaller countries / city states like HK, Singapore and Luxembourg, which have relatively less production capacity of their own and must import most of what they use.
 
Why would Luxembourg be any different from other European countries? Wouldn't Luxembourg have almost the same access to products grown nearby as other European countries? I suspect that the analysis performed did not properly identify the source of imports but rather assumed a fixed import footprint per volume or consumption of goods is everything because Luxembourg has recycling, is not a big manufacturer, doesn't have long commutes, and has a good rail system connection to the European network.
 
Read the original document! The reporter misled the readers. The writer and the reporter has no idea about the data showing in the research and the situation of each countries.
You may find that there is an extraordinary high CF percentage in clothing and manufacturing section of Hong Kong.
Hong Kong is a major exporter of textile products to US/EU since it still owns a lot of US textile quota. However, most of the production is not in Hong Kong but in China. All textiles products can be claimed as Made in Hong Kong simply 13% of the manufacturing process are located in Hong Kong. Most of the imported textile products will then be re-export to US/EU afterward. Hong Kong is still the home base of many manufacturers but not the place of manufacturing due to its simple taxation system. Many consumer goods are re-export to other countries due to the taxation issue. You may find a good numbers about the re-export data (also the data of its cargo terminals) in Hong Kong Government home page.
We need to read the news wisely and the reporter is just RE-PORT the news without digestion...
US is still the highest CF nation in the world and 1/4 of the CF of China is accounted for the manufacturing goods to US.
Leo
 
Last edited:
by the way, Luxembourg is a transportation hub in Europe and you may find an extraordinary high CF number in MOBILITY.

Leo
 
Try sqeezing the GTA's population of roughly 6.2 million into the land mass of Metro Toronto (including Etobicoke, Scarb, etc) and spill some people into Vaughan....now that's roughly the land mass of Hong Kong and its population is just over 7 million....I surely wouldn't want to live there.
 
Not really, 70% of Hong Kong is hilly area. 7M of people is living in 30% of the land of Hong Kong. 99% of people are living in high raised buildings and it is the way to EXPAND the area of Hong Kong.
Hong Kong has poor air quality due to the incoming of pollutants from mainland China. But Hong Kong has the highly effective transportation system and infrastructure. It is the place for young who love metropolitan and convenience. It is a very dynamic place.

Toronto downtown now is very much similar to Hong Kong...highraised condo apartment costs 300,000 with only one bedroom.

Merry Christmas to all,

Leo
 
Read the original document! The reporter misled the readers. The writer and the reporter has no idea about the data showing in the research and the situation of each countries.
You may find that there is an extraordinary high CF percentage in clothing and manufacturing section of Hong Kong.
Hong Kong is a major exporter of textile products to US/EU since it still owns a lot of US textile quota. However, most of the production is not in Hong Kong but in China. All textiles products can be claimed as Made in Hong Kong simply 13% of the manufacturing process are located in Hong Kong. Most of the imported textile products will then be re-export to US/EU afterward. Hong Kong is still the home base of many manufacturers but not the place of manufacturing due to its simple taxation system. Many consumer goods are re-export to other countries due to the taxation issue. You may find a good numbers about the re-export data (also the data of its cargo terminals) in Hong Kong Government home page.
We need to read the news wisely and the reporter is just RE-PORT the news without digestion...
US is still the highest CF nation in the world and 1/4 of the CF of China is accounted for the manufacturing goods to US.
Leo
The authors are not very comprehensive in the description of their methodology in the paper, but it seems that they are looking at the final consumption of the products in each region and not simply the import/export, so I would say the re-export issue is unlikely to be skewing HK's values.

Toronto downtown now is very much similar to Hong Kong...highraised condo apartment costs 300,000 with only one bedroom.
Fortunately Toronto is still far from being at HK's ridiculous level of real estate prices. $2 million HKD (~$300K CAD) can hardly buy you anything much more than 500 sqft in HK Island or Kowloon, and we certainly don't have anything selling for anywhere remotely near $12K/sqft here.
 
by the way, Luxembourg is a transportation hub in Europe and you may find an extraordinary high CF number in MOBILITY.

It doesn't even have a reasonably sized airport and far more people transit by rail through Belgium.
 

Back
Top