I think Rectory is decent on the Island.
But to be sure it and like spaces (major parks) could use better choices.
One problem is that the tender process is designed to condemn us to junk.
To begin with its 'highest bidder' in terms of payments to the City. Fast Food junk often turns a higher per sq ft profit that some little indy place doing neat things can't.
Also, to be compliant you often have to have 'experience' and 'security' and significant capital and insurance.
I'm not suggesting they should just turn places over w/o insurance; but the requirements are harder to meet if your a start-up or independent.
Still, if the added 'food quality' to the tender, I'm sure, people would turn blue; and the City would mess it up as bad as 'A la Carte'
********
What would be nice though is if the City could at least set-up a high end restaurant concept, and somehow loosely describe it (so as not to be prescriptive) and then let McEwan, Kennedy and O&B go at it to give us a 4* offer in say High Park or on the Islands or at Edwards' Gardens.
For variety in smaller concessions, it might be better to let a master-franchise go, and require them to find at least '25%' of tenants shall serve healthy options, or 'offerings shall reflect cultural diversity'. The problem being I can't see a way for the City to actually put a tender out that says, McDonald's and Pizza Pizza can not apply.