[Stevey_G]

This is the old EERS building right? I remember volunteering my time there during the Fort Mac Wildfires. I'll never forget many donations came in from Edmontonians, nor the efforts of all the people in that place that went beyond the one single emergency I was apart of.

Truly was an anchor of the community.

 

[Stevey_G]

Can someone help me out and explain how that car got on there? I don't see a gap in that fence anywhere... is there another entrance?

Construction fencing also pops apart pretty easily. you can move a section in 2 seconds.

 

[David A]

There you go...one car = parking lot!

That is very exclusive VIP parking !!!

 

[KreationYEG]

For reference

 

[johnnyboy]

^ Thanks!

 

[KreationYEG]

 

[degrandprix]

I guess this one is a few years out at least.

What's to stop someone from bumping their F350 into the wall and knocking it over?

 

[johnnyboy]

View attachment 694597

Honestly, this is not much better than what the Arlington owners are trying to do.

 

[Edmcowboy11]

On one hand a beautiful new park opens up in the downtown core getting rid of a bunch of parking lots. On the other hand another building is lost and another parking lot is opened. I wish there was a way to set a moratorium on any new parking lots within the downtown core.

 

[johnnyboy]

On one hand a beautiful new park opens up in the downtown core getting rid of a bunch of parking lots. On the other hand another building is lost and another parking lot is opened. I wish there was a way to set a moratorium on any new parking lots within the downtown core.

Council passed a bylaw last Dec that I thought stated no new parking lots would be allowed downtown.

New Edmonton bylaw cracks down on illegal parking lots Downtown, central neighbourhoods

Edmonton council passed a bylaw hoping to make 120 parking lots around Downtown safer and better-looking by June 2026, or face closure.

edmontonjournal.com

 

[Edmcowboy11]

The article did mention no new lots. So what loophole happened here?

 

[bodsbods9090]

The article did mention no new lots. So what loophole happened here?

Well if you hide the lot behind a nice looking building, voila!

 

[archited]

I can hardly wait for the rationale/excuses meant to pardon this latest move by WP.

 

[Greenspace]

This redevelopment was considered a 'parkade' not temporary surface parking. It's not ideal by any stretch.

 

[johnnyboy]

This redevelopment was considered a 'parkade' not temporary surface parking. It's not ideal by any stretch.

The CoE's definition: https://zoningbylaw.edmonton.ca/parkade