jianxia15
Active Member
There is a big slope around that section, going downward from Credo and then upward to the park. Not sure whether this will affect the construction of a mid-rise.
|
|
|
Building on a slope is a bit more expensive, but it's not a big deal.There is a big slope around that section, going downward from Credo and then upward to the park. Not sure whether this will affect the construction of a mid-rise.
Sometimes the proposed development have so many bylaw relaxations required in order to make it pencil that a DC is crafted -- makes it a permitted (ie unappealable) use.Mostly if somehow the R-CG zoning concept as a whole disappears due to crazy politics, this project would still be allowed imo, to expand on my certainty point.
If construction starts, I'll create thread.In other infill news, an infill on the SE corner of 19th street and 24th ave might be starting construction soon. Demo is happening and construction fencing going up.
Provide themselves or their future buyer absolute certainty.
I'm also curious about this - if they're building something that would be allowed under R-CG, why go through the effort of redesignation to DC?
Yeah seems odd in that way - but I am not an expert in the R-CG rezoning process now that that has passed citywide, perhaps to @darwink 's point, this is just to really spell out exactly what can happen on this parcel to make it easier to sell. It sounds like it just has R-CG base characteristics, but they have removed the ability to have single, semis or duplexes via the DC - so that would be the only change?
Mostly if somehow the R-CG zoning concept as a whole disappears due to crazy politics, this project would still be allowed imo, to expand on my certainty point.
Any restrictive covenant here? If my understanding of them is correct, at least some won't be impacted by RCG given the non minimum density, whereas the direct control, specifically mentioning minimum density, will overrule them (depending on their specific wording).ah that makes a lot of sense.