aquateam
Active Member
IMO, the glass is 90+ % full. No reason to complain .. yet.
That means it's almost 10% empty
|
|
|
IMO, the glass is 90+ % full. No reason to complain .. yet.
Not to Jimmy K, it won't be.Remember, it's a pilot, with a scorecard. If TTC returns to Council with data showing that the post-10 PM velocity is terrible, that will be compelling
The problem with is idea is not logistics, truck deliveries, or money (maybe though). It's just too confusing for people in the city and people coming in. One way streets are great in other cities as well in some parts of downtown, but making two of the main east-west roads depend on one another can lead to confusion.This my first post here and I'm curious to know your thoughts. Please be gentle.
It seems the city wants to accompany everyone, yet tick all off - equally.
Why cant the City make King and Queen one way streets only?
Use the right hand lane for bikes and streetcar stops. Cars can only use the right hand lane when turning right off K & Q or entering K & Q. Increase the frequency of running streetcars and allow the two left lanes for vehicle traffic. Abandon the unused rail line. If pressed, and only during off peak hours, the city could allow for parking along K & Q in the most left lane. Everyone wins!
Can you imagine how efficient this could be if you synchronize the traffic lights?
I get that pedestrians will need to go north or south to get to these routes, but buses on a short loop can address this.
Lets be realistic. The proposed pilot project will not fix anything and push congestion onto he already congested alternative routes.
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks
This my first post here and I'm curious to know your thoughts. Please be gentle.
It seems the city wants to accompany everyone, yet tick all off - equally.
Why cant the City make King and Queen one way streets only?
Use the right hand lane for bikes and streetcar stops. Cars can only use the right hand lane when turning right off K & Q or entering K & Q. Increase the frequency of running streetcars and allow the two left lanes for vehicle traffic. Abandon the unused rail line. If pressed, and only during off peak hours, the city could allow for parking along K & Q in the most left lane. Everyone wins!
Can you imagine how efficient this could be if you synchronize the traffic lights?
I get that pedestrians will need to go north or south to get to these routes, but buses on a short loop can address this.
Lets be realistic. The proposed pilot project will not fix anything and push congestion onto he already congested alternative routes.
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks
Whenever I see "Jimmy K"...my thoughts go back to the restaurant in the Beach(es)....as for the Councillor, he should get an award for his impersonations...Not to Jimmy K, it won't be.
As to 'One Waying' Queen and King, I'm sure Metro must have looked at that back in the day.Whenever I see "Jimmy K"...my thoughts go back to the restaurant in the Beach(es)....as for the Councillor, he should get an award for his impersonations...
One way streets tend to move faster and street life deadens. See Richmond/Adelaide, also Hamilton.
Without spinning this string off-topic:That has nothing to do with the streets being one-way. See New York City, San Francisco, Washington DC, Montreal, Vancouver, Seattle, Chicago, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Valencia, Barcelona, Paris, London, Brussels, Amsterdam, and many many other examples.
https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2016/5/24/returning-one-way-streets-back-to-their-two-way-rootsRETURNING ONE-WAY STREETS TO THEIR TWO-WAY ROOTS
MAY 25, 2016
BY RACHEL QUEDNAU
A recent article out of South Bend, IN suggests that the movement toward two-way streets is growing. South Bend plans to convert many of its downtown streets back into two-ways by the end of 2016.
As an example from the neighboring state of Kentucky, the articleexplains how one multilane couplet (two parallel one-way streets that move traffic in opposite directions) was previously a high crime, low-property value area in : [....continues...]
Gosh...do you think it might be more than just one city?A rust belt city with 100,000 residents that's been shrinking for more than half a century has absolutely no bearing on Toronto.
The Case Against One-Way Streets
Jan 31, 2013
By Eric Jaffe
Read More: http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2013/01/case-against-one-way-streets/4549/
PDF Study: http://www.uctc.net/access/41/access41-2way.pdf
.....
Cities have long been home to one-way streets because transportation engineers believe they move cars better than two-way streets do. That's largely the case because one-way streets eliminate tough left turns through oncoming traffic. Any way around conflicting lefts, on two-way streets, creates congestion: left-turn lanes take up space, and guarded signals take up time. Vikash Gayah, a civil engineer at Penn State University, isn't so sure about that conventional wisdom. In addition to the aforementioned reasons to convert one-way streets, Gayah believes congestion will improve as well. [...]