innsertnamehere
Superstar
ubers do have to display a small sticker in their rear windsheild - but also, anyone could stick one back there then get free rides right down King street.
|
|
|
Drivers of the most polluting diesel vehicles will pay a charge to enter central London starting Monday in the latest attempt by the city’s mayor to crack down on air pollution.
The 10-pound ($16) T-Charge targets older, more polluting vehicles that are causing London to have some of the worst air in Europe. Almost 8 million people live in parts of the city where air quality breaches World Health Organization guidelines, according to the office of Mayor Sadiq Khan.
“The shameful scale of the public health crisis London faces, with thousands of premature deaths caused by air pollution, must be addressed,” said Khan in an emailed statement. “Today marks a major milestone in this journey with the introduction of the T-Charge to encourage motorists to ditch polluting, harmful vehicles.”...
This project would really benefit from Streetcar stop islands like on College etc, so that the right turning cars would not obstruct the passengers getting on and off the streetcars.
Perhaps they didn't do enough for the pedestrians; but that could be adjusted in a few months. They aren't building any massive structures that would be too expensive to remove in the near future.
Just from the transit flow point of view, the plans looks reasonable. However, they should provide advanced green for the left turns to northbound Bathurst, and to southbound Jarvis. Otherwise, cars waiting to make those turns will block the streetcars.
This project would really benefit from Streetcar stop islands like on College etc, so that the right turning cars would not obstruct the passengers getting on and off the streetcars.
The sense I got from the consultations, and the project overall, is that the city did not want to spend any money on permanent infrastructure during the pilot, but instead wanted to just use paint, planters, and signage to set up the scheme, things that can easily be undone. And I'm not sure that's necessarily the wrong choice for a pilot.The fact that they didn’t listen (at least a dozen people brought this up during the group consultations) doesnt build any encouragement that they will during the pilot or after. This was such a simple item in the overall scheme of things and they failed it. Why widen an already wide sidewalk when the sidewalk on the other side along the theatres is desperately overcrowded?
The fact that they didn’t listen (at least a dozen people brought this up during the group consultations) doesnt build any encouragement that they will during the pilot or after. This was such a simple item in the overall scheme of things and they failed it. Why widen an already wide sidewalk when the sidewalk on the other side along the theatres is desperately overcrowded?
The sense I got from the consultations, and the project overall, is that the city did not want to spend any money on permanent infrastructure during the pilot, but instead wanted to just use paint, planters, and signage to set up the scheme, things that can easily be undone. And I'm not sure that's necessarily the wrong choice for a pilot.
I think you may be overstating the consultations and the outcomes. They did consult both with residents and business. They decided that the chartered bus stop by the theaters were important. And would provide the best use of the space. Just because they did not agree with your point of view doesn't mean they did not listen.
Toronto needs tourist revenue. Whether it is the person that comes for a weekend or on a bus tour for a day (many of which are seniors and have a hard time walking). I would not want anything that would hinder the ability for them to see a play and have dinner. And I applaud the final design that does not restrict this ability.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but wouldn't widening the sidewalks actually require construction, at least if you want them at the proper grade?No permanent infrastructure would be needed to improve the walking realm during the pilot. It was a deliberate decision to give the north side (westbound) car lane along the theatre row to cars for taxi stands and drop offs and instead widen the already wide sidewalks on the south side
Toronto has widened sidewalks in the past by just fencing off a traffic lane and allowing people to walk in them.....not far south of King, York Street has a sidewalk widened in this fashion just now (runs from Wellington south to Front).Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but wouldn't widening the sidewalks actually require construction, at least if you want them at the proper grade?
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but wouldn't widening the sidewalks actually require construction, at least if you want them at the proper grade?