|
|
|
Wondering why is Leaside considered an upscale/expensive neighbourhood... I drove past it a few times, looks pretty boring and suburban to me. Eglinton/Laird isn't that different from Kennedy/Finch IMO.
It's boring because it is a planned town. I wouldn't consider it suburban though, it predates the post-war sprawl, there are plenty of semi-detached houses and is generally a lot denser low-rise neighbourhood than what you find in the 'burbs.
During its maiden years it was very much a working class neighborhood but today average household incomes are in the range of upper middle class.
Perhaps. I would definitely agree it is one of the more suburban areas in the old city of Toronto. (Even though technically its not part of Old Toronto)
I believe when the town was originally planned, Millwood and McRae were originally supposed to have more storefronts. I gather that changed or regressed back to residential over time following changing demographics and the automobile.
If we consider Bayview Avenue as Leaside however, I cannot see how you could call that stretch of the city boring. With the subway coming to Eglinton, this part of the city is only bound to become more exciting with mixed used developments between Soudan and Eglinton on Bayview, infill projects in former industrial lands along Laird, and redevelopment along Eglinton Avenue as per the Avenue Plan.
edit: Leaside is also a nice map location for Google Maps Pacman.
as a resident of leaside, i tried this days agoedit: Leaside is also a nice map location for Google Maps Pacman.
What separates Leaside from suburbia is it's nearness to downtown, which is what primarily drives house prices, and it's proximity to lots of retail. I can literally walk to 7 grocery stores, soon to be 8 when Whole Foods opens. My wife and I and our two children often load up the stroller and do an evening walking tour of either the Bayview, Mt. Pleasant or Laird strip and stock up on groceries, booze and anything else we might need. It's just a great place to live.
You can't get a sense of the neighbourhood by driving by "a few times". If you lived here for a bit you'd understand why it is not like deep suburbia like anything along Kennedy.
the streets themselves may be only 2 lanes wide, but the houses are ~well~ set back from themNarrow tree-lined streets
Yeah so I'd also add:
-I mean, you could consider Rosedale "suburban" by some definitions, but it's still probably the most desirable, nicest and expensive place in Toronto for a huge amount of people. Everyone wants different things.
1) leaside is not car dependent by virtue of location (it can be walked from one end to the other in under an hour) -- it may very well be car dependent because everybody's rich and has lotsa cars (except for those people like me living in mid-rises)My definitely of suburban
1) highly car dependent
2) not self sufficient (you would have to go outside the neighbourhood for all necessities including shopping, dining, entertainment.)