Skeezix
Senior Member
So basically you're saying to build condos anywhere where there isn't enough condos?
Should we get rid of the don valley parkland for this?
Wall to wall condos?
again, where do you want to draw the line?
um, what?
|
|
|
So basically you're saying to build condos anywhere where there isn't enough condos?
Should we get rid of the don valley parkland for this?
Wall to wall condos?
again, where do you want to draw the line?
???um, what?
First, this isn't a private discussion you're having. It's a forum. When you post a comment here, you're engaged in a discussion with everyone.
Second, half of us here have ksun set on "ignore" - for obvious reasons. We don't see his posts. You couldn't have known that, of course, but it looked like (more than just to me) like you were responding to Thereon's earlier post expressing support for the seniors centre. Which is why your post seemed like such a non-sequitur. Knowing now that you were responsing to ksun, your post now makes a lot more sense (I don't even need to know what ksun wrote).
So basically you're saying to build condos anywhere where there isn't enough condos?
Should we get rid of the don valley parkland for this?
Wall to wall condos?
again, where do you want to draw the line?
First, this isn't a private discussion you're having. It's a forum. When you post a comment here, you're engaged in a discussion with everyone.
Second, half of us here have ksun set on "ignore" - for obvious reasons. We don't see his posts. You couldn't have known that, of course, but it looked like (more than just to me) like you were responding to Thereon's earlier post expressing support for the seniors centre. Which is why your post seemed like such a non-sequitur. Knowing now that you were responsing to ksun, your post now makes a lot more sense (I don't even need to know what ksun wrote).
Where did I say build condos anywhere? Don't dramatize my words.
What I said is that I don't see why there should be more density added to Leaside. I am not proposing tearing down all houses, but there are definitely a lot of space where density can be added. For example, is the the best Toronto can do with space 15 minutes from downtown? I see no beauty in that which people desperate want to "protect". It can pass as any neighbourhood in Orlando or Houston. I mean, what the hell IS that?
I mean, what the hell IS that?
that's an urban mall, characterized by more square footage devoted to cars than actual shops
because as we all know, people prefer to live in communities where you have to drive everywhere
war on the car, my ass
And people tried to convince me Leaside is "urban" with walkable lifestyle.
It is. I can walk to that mall, for example. In fact most days when the co-operates, I pack the kids up in the stroller, say hi to my neighbours and walk right over to any of the stores and restaurants on Laird, Eglinton, Bayview or Mt. Pleasant. What's awesome about Leaside is that we have all the small stuff, like restaurants and mom 'n pop shops along with all the big box stores. I've been renovating my house non-stop for 5 years and having a Home Depot and a Canadian Tire within walking distance has been a god-send.
What confuses me is that someone like me, who lives here, tells people that Leaside is a great neighbourhood where you can walk to lots of places, then gets a negative response from someone who doesn't live here. I mean, which one of us knows better?
that's happening as we speak...density should be added to allow more people to live in this conveniently located place, to make transit more attractive