[innsertnamehere]

I was reading a London Free Press article this morning discussing the City of London’s traffic congestion ranking. In addition to posting the article, I will post the source - TomTom’s Traffic Ranking Index. This index uses GPS data to determine the most congested cities globally (based on the approximate time taken to travel 10 km). The most recent ranking is from 2023 data.

When you set the filter to North America, from a city-centre perspective, London is ranked as the 12th most congested city in North America, and the 5th most congested metro area in North America. Canadian cities are disproportionately represented at the top of the North American metro list, occupying 8 of the top 10 spots.

Additional data from the City, presented in the article, shows that Wonderland/Oxford, Commissioners/Wellington, Oxford/Highbury, Southdale/Wellington, and Fanshawe Park/Richmond are the most congested intersections in the city, ranging from around 65,000 to 73,000 AADT. I think this obviously continues to show that there is an incredible need for the completion of the full BRT system, in addition to further extensions and/or spurs. I still think they should have gone for a full LRT system instead, but that ship sailed long ago.

london's fatal mistake was to not build an urban expressway system to take traffic off of local roads. Cross-city traffic needs to battle it across the city on local streets which just drives up congestion and makes for a much more unpleasant local environment and makes it more challenging to build anything but mega-arterials focused on car movement.

The experience driving in London compared to other comparable southwestern Ontario cities like Hamilton and Kitchener is night and day - and it's because Hamilton and Kitchener have expressway systems to take car traffic off of local streets.

 

[jje1000]

london's fatal mistake was to not build an urban expressway system to take traffic off of local roads. Cross-city traffic needs to battle it across the city on local streets which just drives up congestion and makes for a much more unpleasant local environment and makes it more challenging to build anything but mega-arterials focused on car movement.

The experience driving in London compared to other comparable southwestern Ontario cities like Hamilton and Kitchener is night and day - and it's because Hamilton and Kitchener have expressway systems to take car traffic off of local streets.

I think it's interesting that not building urban expressways and still switching to personal vehicular transport modes and suburbanization results in the worst of both worlds.

My experience is that London roads somehow feel beefed-up to compensate, and are less pleasant to walk on.

 

[innsertnamehere]

I think it's interesting that not building urban expressways and still switching to personal vehicular transport modes and suburbanization results in the worst of both worlds.

My experience is that London roads somehow feel beefed-up to compensate, and are less pleasant to walk on.

Yup. It's the opposite of the Netherlands which actually has a large number of urban expressways through it's cities to shift car traffic away from areas with pedestrians. It ends up working better for everyone.

 

[micheal_can]

I think it's interesting that not building urban expressways and still switching to personal vehicular transport modes and suburbanization results in the worst of both worlds.

My experience is that London roads somehow feel beefed-up to compensate, and are less pleasant to walk on.

Outside the core, they are horrible to walk on, but are not too bad to bike along.