Foolworm
Active Member
I'm not sure if the NW peak hour route will go ahead, since it was meant to be a placeholder for the Metro Line extension. Someone else pointed out that we weren't likely to hear about any Metro Line funding in the budget since City Council hasn't officially requested anything yet. You raise a very good point, but since they made the deliberate decision to put it back in the plan, I'm hopeful that the fall budget will include something tangible!
And if the UCP was willing to approve the VLW extension soon after getting into office (even while stonewalling Calgary's Green Line), I think they'd be even more open to this since next year is an election year. I know this is Edmonton and everything, but infrastructure jobs are still pretty darn tempting for governments. Especially when the alternative is getting lambasted by the opposition for torpedoing those jobs.
Fair enough, although I think it's the higher levels of government that declare an open day for funding transit, after which the municipalities put in their specific requests. So far I haven't seen this happen: in the recent budget Sohi was griping about more immediate priorities like COVID recovery and FIFA funding, and I would agree that capital infrastructure is a secondary consideration.
I am also pretty sure that the next Provinicial election is one of survival for the UCP, so Edmonton as an NDP stronghold will probably be passed over for battleground ridings. In any case I think Edmonton has plenty enough transit projects going on, and would rather some ribbons be cut before ground is broken again (looking at Valley line southeast here...)
Pardon my ignorance, but why do we think the NW BRT would be peak only?
Keep in mind that the Terwillegar/ Fox Drive, 97 St, and Whyte Ave bus lanes/ BRT overlap with EMTSC routes. I don't believe at this point that the EMTSC shows a route down 153 Ave, but certainly 97 St they do, and it seems to be an all day route. Surely a LRT precursor service would provide all day service?
Regardless, I figure there's a lot more to come with the EMTSC in relation to these routes.
Because there is a proposed bus lane buildout in the report:
I don't see the BRT system as a LRT precursor but rather as a secondary network in the mass transit system. Also keep in mind that regional routes are considered elsewhere; this particular diagram is really just to show the City of Edmonton's transit priority corridors.