News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

What does this have to do with LRT safety?
The LRT is safer? TBH, I never feel very safe or comfortable on AHD, but then I don't use it much so there is a lack of familiarity.

Probably a similar feeling to those who occasionally use LRT only for special events.
 
A lot of people were over reacting to the accidents with the new LRT saying they should put gates and bells everywhere etc. People will get used to it The AHD has been open for years and people are still running into the infrastructure. You can’t fix stupid.
 
The downtown stations were originally designed for proof of payment with fare kiosks at the entrances to the platforms.

I'm not sure how widespread it was or how long they were there for, but for a period of time Churchill, and perhaps some other stations, had turnstiles as well. These photos are at the ERRS Archive.
Screenshot_20230620-122818_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20230620-122751_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20230620-122649_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20230620-122850_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20230620-122919_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20230620-122940_Drive.jpg

Bonus pictures of a ticket agent in action, and a ticket agent booth at Belvedere (1979).
Screenshot_20230620-123028_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20230620-123335_Drive.jpg

EDIT: I am digging through the Edmonton Journal archive. I still can't find when the turnstiles were removed, but it looks like they were at least at the underground stations (Belvedere is a possibility but the article mentioning it was unclear), and there were two kinds: Free-moving turnstiles for those with transfers and passes, and locked turnstiles that riders inserted coins into, which would then unlock and print a ticket. The turnstiles were introduced with the Proof-of-Payment system that replaced ticket agents - although agents remained for a period of time during the transition.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how widespread it was or how long they were there for, but for a period of time Churchill, and perhaps some other stations, had turnstiles as well. These photos are at the ERRS Archive.
View attachment 486707View attachment 486706View attachment 486705View attachment 486708View attachment 486709View attachment 486710

Bonus pictures of a ticket agent in action, and a ticket agent booth at Belvedere (1979).
View attachment 486711View attachment 486712

EDIT: I am digging through the Edmonton Journal archive. I still can't find when the turnstiles were removed, but it looks like they were at least at the underground stations (Belvedere is a possibility but the article mentioning it was unclear), and there were two kinds: Free-moving turnstiles for those with transfers and passes, and locked turnstiles that riders inserted coins into, which would then unlock and print a ticket. The turnstiles were introduced with the Proof-of-Payment system that replaced ticket agents - although agents remained for a period of time during the transition.
I forgot about those till the photos were posted. and then it came screaming back.
 
I'm not sure how widespread it was or how long they were there for, but for a period of time Churchill, and perhaps some other stations, had turnstiles as well. These photos are at the ERRS Archive.
View attachment 486707View attachment 486706View attachment 486705View attachment 486708View attachment 486709View attachment 486710

Bonus pictures of a ticket agent in action, and a ticket agent booth at Belvedere (1979).
View attachment 486711View attachment 486712

EDIT: I am digging through the Edmonton Journal archive. I still can't find when the turnstiles were removed, but it looks like they were at least at the underground stations (Belvedere is a possibility but the article mentioning it was unclear), and there were two kinds: Free-moving turnstiles for those with transfers and passes, and locked turnstiles that riders inserted coins into, which would then unlock and print a ticket. The turnstiles were introduced with the Proof-of-Payment system that replaced ticket agents - although agents remained for a period of time during the transition.
A lot of things have happened to the city, transit and downtown LRT over the years. I recall a period of time when it was free downtown during mid day to encourage more use.

Maybe the turnstiles were removed in anticipation of or to facilitate that. Obviously, the city was a lot smaller when the LRT first started, so maybe it was felt they were not needed at that point, but I feel they are now.
 
Maybe the turnstiles were removed in anticipation of or to facilitate that.
I don't think so; if I recall correctly, one of the articles I found mentioned people still putting money into the turnstiles even if they were staying within the free zone, because they were unaware of it.
 
I had thought they were not around by then, but that was a long time ago and I don't recall exactly.

That free zone, I think it was in the early 1990's, was only for several downtown LRT stations, so people would still have to pay if they went outside the zone.

Yes, I could see how it could easily get confusing if you were behind someone who paid, because they were going outside the zone, but not realizing you assumed you had to also, even though you didn't.
 
I had thought they were not around by then, but that was a long time ago and I don't recall exactly.

That free zone, I think it was in the early 1990's, was only for several downtown LRT stations, so people would still have to pay if they went outside the zone.

Yes, I could see how it could easily get confusing if you were behind someone who paid, because they were going outside the zone, but not realizing you assumed you had to also, even though you didn't.
See the second last paragraph.
Turnstile.PNG
 
Thanks for all the information - good article. I was not downtown much at that time, but I remember the free zone from later.

So as per the last part, the cheap decals that didn't stand out or were not well placed, which led to some of the confusion.

As always, it comes down to good implementation, some things never change.
 
A lot of people were over reacting to the accidents with the new LRT saying they should put gates and bells everywhere etc. People will get used to it The AHD has been open for years and people are still running into the infrastructure. You can’t fix stupid.
Apples and oranges. The LRT will be running down the middle of streets with no bollards or crossing gates. Cities which have had this same type of system for years, like Denver and Houston, are STILL having accidents caused by the alignment. A flawed design will always be a flawed design.

The Valley Line has had a plethora of accidents already and the line isn't even in revenue service. This doesn't bode well. And responsible transportation management means fixing designs which are inherently flawed or accident-prone, rather than telling the public to "get used to it." There are plenty of intersections around the capital region where city administrations have had to perform tweaks or change the designs because of an overabundance of crashes or near-misses.

Look at the 23 Avenue overpass at Calgary Trail. At one time that was an at-grade intersection which had racked up so many crashes that it was listed as the deadliest intersection in the city. Municipal administration didn't just launch an awareness campaign and nag people to "drive better!"--they invested a lot of money and performed a proper fix at that intersection.

Major infrastructure like the 23 Ave interchange and the LRT lines should NEVER be built on the cheap. They are supposed to be legacy projects that serve the community for decades. Investing the proper amount of money and building them right the first time should be a no-brainer.
 
Valley line is an urban vehicle much like the old street cars or trams all over Europe. Not meant to be a high speed commuter train to the burbs. It serves the higher density inner city hop on hop off shorter travel. Adding bells and gates are not necessary just get used to it.
 
Valley line is an urban vehicle much like the old street cars or trams all over Europe. Not meant to be a high speed commuter train to the burbs. It serves the higher density inner city hop on hop off shorter travel. Adding bells and gates are not necessary just get used to it.
But that's not what Mill Woods was promised when LRT was pledged to the area decades ago. They weren't promised a streetcar or tourist tram, they were promised light rail transit similar to what the northeast already had. The Valley Line is a massive downgrade.

Remember, the whole logic of running the line to Mill Woods is not for people to sightsee, it's to get commuters between the southeast and the city core.
 

Back
Top