News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.3K     0 

I know that, but we can't even build a one stop subway line...

That one-stop subway line is 6km through bad soil. It isn't exactly easy, especially when the business case for it is poor and the cost of construction keeps going up.

You do know that China has a population of 1,373,541,278 versus Canada's population of 35,151,728?

From link.

There is a lot wrong with a comparison to China, in terms of level of government involvement, corruption, lack of safety standards, cheaper materials, and cheaper labour force.

But the underlying motivation of the comparison I believe is that we really got to be asking ourselves, why the heck is subway construction in Toronto and in Canada in general, ballooning to the extent that it has? We very likely have some of the most expensive construction costs in the Western world.

For a more reasonable comparison, we can look at Warsaw's metro extension across the Vistula river. Poland has cheaper labour costs compared to us, but still expensive compared to China, and with all the safety regulations we have in Canada. Let's see what they did:

metro - 3.png


Line 2 (Red) - 7 stations opened in 2015. It took 5 years of construction time, it cost PLN 4.17 Billion or $1.45 Billion CAD, with costs raising to approximately $2 Billion CAD including purchasing of rolling stock.

And unlike the tiny Don River, this metro subway had to go under the Vistula River, a substantially larger obstacle:

fotolia_66446539_subscription_monthly_m.jpg


Our equivalant to Warsaw's Line 2 would be the Downtown Relief Line, which is going to cost how many times more again?
 
Perhaps the people who planned and built the line in warsaw should come and built the DRL. To me I feel its money passing into politician pockets.
 
That would be an Italian-Turkish-Polish consortium.

It does beg the question if whether we should be looking internationally for tendors, especially with rolling stock purchases.

In our case, it would be a "Canada, United States of America, Mexico..." consortium. However, with what happened with the Mexico fiasco with the Bombardier streetcars, maybe we shouldn't.
 
Interesting opinion article on reforming city council, from the Sun surprisingly enough.

Definitely agree with shifting small decisions to community council- something like adding new sidewalks to a street should not be clogging up city council's agenda. Also agree with making more data public, though that really lies more with the political will to do what's right rather than what's politically important.

How to fix Toronto city council
System's broken, needs to be retooled: Task force

KEY PROPOSALS


Some of the key recommendations from the task force:
  • All city agencies should be publicly reviewed by council every few years on a rolling basis.
  • Change the budget process to focus on priorities and require committee review of off-budget changes.
  • Council can save time by shifting more neighbourhood-level decisions to (existing) community councils.
  • City Hall needs new systems to make more data public before key decisions.
  • Motions should include a “citizen summary” to be more accessible to residents and delegations.
- Kelcey is an urban policy consultant at State of the City Inc.; Eidelman is an assistant professor at the U of T’s School of Public Policy and Governance. Both organized the City Hall Task Force, which recently released its final report: uoft.me/cityhalltaskforce

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/07/05/how-to-fix-toronto-city-council
 
Toronto's new transformation officer aims to make city more efficient

Toronto’s newest civil servant has his eye on the future.

On July 4, Mayor John Tory announced that Michael Kolm is Toronto’s first transformation officer, a new position working directly under city manager Peter Wallace, whose job is to look for new ways to deliver services more efficiently and cost-effectively.


That means looking at not just technologies, but processes and partnerships, too, says a news release from the mayor’s office.


The position title is borrowed from businesses focused on information technology, where growth in computational power and technology require increasingly rapid change in every aspect of a business.

In the context of municipal government, Kolm will be working in four areas.

He will be: analyzing the structure of city government, looking for ways to increase collaboration and improve outcomes; looking to modernize services and improve outcomes for the public; finding opportunities for “shared services and supply chain improvements"; and building “capacity for coordination, innovation, problem solving, strategic planning and proactive communications throughout the organization.”

Kolm’s office will also have the assistance of Eglinton-Lawrence Coun. Christin Carmichael Greb, who will become Toronto’s transformation advocate.

https://www.insidetoronto.com/news-...ion-officer-aims-to-make-city-more-efficient/
 
Interesting opinion article on reforming city council, from the Sun surprisingly enough.

Definitely agree with shifting small decisions to community council- something like adding new sidewalks to a street should not be clogging up city council's agenda. Also agree with making more data public, though that really lies more with the political will to do what's right rather than what's politically important.



http://www.torontosun.com/2017/07/05/how-to-fix-toronto-city-council
This was suggested a year ago, along with other improvements.
 
Toronto council debating $6.7M climate change plan amid rising flood costs
Ambitious TransformTO climate change strategy is at risk of being pulled apart at city hall, advocates warn.

From Toronto Metro News, at this link.

Advocates of what has been called an ambitious climate change action plan fear Mayor John Tory and allies want to pull the plan apart to fund just pieces of it.

That debate on the TransformTO plan will unfold at council next week, where the rising cost of lost revenues and flood repairs on Toronto Island and along the waterfront is also on the agenda.

“We have to make sure that our climate change TransformTO plan prioritizes the work that will give us the greatest immediate impact in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and the reduction of those emissions,” Tory told reporters at a press conference Thursday on the city’s preparedness for extreme weather events. “As a city, we need to set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

Asked if he had cost concerns about the plan, which requires $6.7 million in 2018, Tory said it was a “very broad plan” and said it’s “not possible to do everything at once.”

But council critics and environmental advocates say the plan before council is already prioritized based on more than two years of work that included consultations with the community and experts.

“It’s like saying, ‘Which of the legs in a three legged stool are we going to get rid of?’” said Franz Hartmann, executive director of the Toronto Environmental Alliance.

He said not moving forward with the plan as presented would undermine the overall goal of achieving an 80 per reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 levels by 2050.

“What council is looking at is the result of a priority-setting exercise,” Hartmann said, adding $6.7 million is a “drop in the bucket” relative to the city’s billions-dollar budget.

In the meantime, Hartmann said the city continues to pay the severe financial consequences of extreme weather.

After unprecedented flooding this spring, a separate staff report to council next week estimates a loss of $5 million already in revenues related to the ferry and island park closure. That is assuming the island becomes more accessible to the public as of Aug. 1 and regular ferry service resumes. That cost does not include daily expenses related to flood management or necessary repairs to infrastructure that is largely still under water, and beach clean-up.

Staff have also requested the authority to temporarily suspend rent collection and fees for island tenants that are paid to the city, including Centreville and several boat clubs, while the city considers whether to partially or fully forgive those costs — what would contribute to the city’s overall losses.

Councillor Gord Perks, a former Greenpeace campaigner, said the TransformTO plan was deferred from the last council meeting because of behind-the-scenes discussions that prioritization was required to see any funding approved.

“This is very explicitly a consequence of the mayor trying to set a budget direction without having clear policy goals, such as protecting the climate, protected from his budget freeze,” Perks said, referring to an initial budget target of zero increases across divisions.

Perks said the plan is designed with different elements working together — for example a future that is more reliant on electric cars means the need to reduce electricity consumption elsewhere.

“The climate doesn’t care if we make a good try. The climate cares if we are able to keep the level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere below a certain level. You can’t do that if you cut the plan up.”

Why does it seem that the suburb Councillors seem to go have given up on climate change, and don't want to help fight it? They influence the bureaucrats, who in turn affect us.

For example, the streetcar right-of-ways are either concrete or some other hard surface, which doesn't allow rainwater to percolate into the earth, but runoff into the sewers, rivers, and lakes causing more flooding. The bureaucrats don't want to use turf, but are in love with the grey concrete instead.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how much money the city will want to net from this- certainly covering only the supposed costs isn't worth the trouble, I think.

Mayor Tory wants Toronto to get a share of pot revenues


Mayor John Tory is asking the province for a dedicated share of pot revenues — possibly through a special levy — after recreational marijuana becomes legal in Canada next July 1.

While the province plans to regulate the sale of pot in an as yet-to-be determined retail distribution model, it will “be on the shoulders of municipalities,” to pick up “a big part” of the added licensing, zoning by-law enforcement and policing costs, Tory wrote in a letter to Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne.

“Whatever decisions are made, I have no doubt the result will be increased costs for the city of Toronto,” Tory wrote in his letter.

“As a consequence, we would want to discuss with you what the magnitude of those costs might be and reach agreement with you on both increased public health funding and a dedicated share of increased provincial revenues attributable to the sale of marijuana.”

[...]


https://www.thestar.com/news/city_h...s-toronto-to-get-a-share-of-pot-revenues.html
 
For example, the streetcar right-of-ways are either concrete or some other hard surface, which doesn't allow rainwater to percolate into the earth, but runoff into the sewers, rivers, and lakes causing more flooding. The bureaucrats don't want to use turf, but are in love with the grey concrete instead.

Yes, that's just one example of how Toronto manages to shoot itself in the foot again and again. Apparently the fire/emergency services insisted on a hard median to allow their vehicles to run on it... which I find entirely unconvincing given size, entry & exit considerations needed for those vehicles.

Had they greened the medians, there would have been fewer motorists mistakenly driving onto them as well.
 
I wonder how much money the city will want to net from this- certainly covering only the supposed costs isn't worth the trouble, I think.

Mayor Tory wants Toronto to get a share of pot revenues





https://www.thestar.com/news/city_h...s-toronto-to-get-a-share-of-pot-revenues.html

I recently read Colorado has now made over $500M in pot revenues ... and that's only since 2014.

That's a lot of money and a lot of weed for a state of 5.5 million people/potheads.

Ontario has 14 million people.

If this is done right (and it probably won't), Toronto could be in for some serious pot cash.

Again ... my worry? It becomes another GST and no one knows where the money goes and what it's helping to pay for.
 
Meanwhile the Mayor's in the news today trying to combat opiate use. Are you for recreational drug use or not?

Pot is a little different from opiates (to put it mildly) - though honestly it might be beneficial to have a government monopoly on recreational drugs - and sell it at below street price to collapse the illegal market, at that.

AoD
 
Pot is a little different from opiates (to put it mildly) - though honestly it might be beneficial to have a government monopoly on recreational drugs - and sell it at below street price to collapse the illegal market, at that.

AoD

There's also a conflict of interest with selling something that's so detrimental to health. It's not even in the same league as pot, and selling it could be seen as tacit endorsement, especially if they make even a penny of profit. Portugal seems to have struck the right chord with across the board decriminalization though. They saw a significant drop in usage after the funds spent on enforcement and judicial process were diverted to treatment.
 

Back
Top