News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

Where would you send a refugee if they couldn't find work?

In their case, if they could not find work they had to go elsewhere and were not permitted to stay in Australia.

It was done this way to prevent people from getting a free ride paid for by the Government.
 
In their case, if they could not find work they had to go elsewhere and were not permitted to stay in Australia.

Right, but, if you're a refugee (legitimately); then you have nowhere to go back to, presumably.

And you have no more right to enter any other country than the one to which you first applied.

So you would just set people adrift in the ocean?
 
Right, but, if you're a refugee (legitimately); then you have nowhere to go back to, presumably.

And you have no more right to enter any other country than the one to which you first applied.

So you would just set people adrift in the ocean?

I am not sure how it worked exactly but it was part of the Australian Immigration Program and this was how my Grandmother explained it to me. She explained that upon arrival in Australia they had to find stable employment to remain in Australia and services were provided to assist with that.

I can only guess they were sent back to Austria or deported elsewhere. Mind you this was 1958 and it was alot different back then.
 
Just for clarity, the province does pay the City a per diem fee for LTC residents and for shelter users.

The challenge is the difference between the fee and what it actually costs the City to build/operate said facilities.

The main difference is actually on the capital side, because the way the funding model works, the cost of construction is recovered over time through the per diem.

But the province uses a standardize rate across Ontario that does not reflect the cost of land/construction in the City.
Is the rate different for municipal vs private vs non-profit LTC homes?? We all know from covid stats that the City's LTC homes stacked up very well so are the City's cost for 'extras' that made this possible.? (Not that I think extras like having sufficient staff are really extra!)
 
The Detailed (for the public) City budget is now up. I have begun my reading.

For those interested in the Waterfront Capital Budget, I have posted that, here:

 
Is the rate different for municipal vs private vs non-profit LTC homes?? We all know from covid stats that the City's LTC homes stacked up very well so are the City's cost for 'extras' that made this possible.? (Not that I think extras like having sufficient staff are really extra!)

Not sure.
 
I'll do the broad look at the Transportation Services budget here, and I or others can parcel out items to the appropriate threads as partial cross-posts.


1704929286607.png


Comment: Good on cutting the windrow service, like the leaf collection, it was a service not delivered to all communities or even most communities equitable, nor was that likely to change.

****

Despite the Gardiner/DVP upload, there is insufficient money to maintain roads at current levels, and they are set to deteriorate over the next decade:

1704929516295.png


1704929565134.png



****

Some things of note below: Some money has fallen from the sky for King Street; look at the 2025 number for Neighbourhood improvements; holy @#$# that's a lot for the West Toronto Railpath,

1704929758496.png


Next: (comment) - @sunnyraytoronto will make note of the Beecroft Extension funding times; looks like John Street has slipped back to 2025 and many future years..... that is really inefficient.
Some of our Junctionites or those adjacent such as @ProjectEnd, @AlbertC and @smably will note the Dundas/Dupont/Annette project starting in 2025
@mburrrrr will note the Lower Yonge improvements, and I suspect @DSC will follow these as well.
@interchange42 will believe in the long promised Legion Road underpass after it opens and not a day sooner.
Raising my own eyebrow at the very marginal sums allocated to YongeTOmorrow.

1704930200150.png


*****

Below are projects for which Transportation currently lacks money to deliver.

1704930476650.png
 
I'm just going to note here, as a freestanding post; that some numbers in the budget beggar the imagination as to how they were arrived at.

I'm not going to lay this on on our new mayor or budget chief at this point.

But members here are already raising questions, rightfully so about some project inflation.............and there will be more questions by the time I'm finished publishing my budget thoughts.

UT.....don't accept stuff that smells bad. Maybe there's a good explanation, staff deserve some benefit of the doubt; but when project budgets seem vastly outside what you'd expect or have more than doubled in less than 2 years........

Someone should have answers at the ready as to why. Be prepared to email, phone, tweet, or send a query to the media.

Cause for some of these, if there's a good answer, I surely want to hear it.
 
I'll do the broad look at the Transportation Services budget here, and I or others can parcel out items to the appropriate threads as partial cross-posts.


View attachment 532487

Comment: Good on cutting the windrow service, like the leaf collection, it was a service not delivered to all communities or even most communities equitable, nor was that likely to change.

****

Despite the Gardiner/DVP upload, there is insufficient money to maintain roads at current levels, and they are set to deteriorate over the next decade:

View attachment 532488

View attachment 532489


****

Some things of note below: Some money has fallen from the sky for King Street; look at the 2025 number for Neighbourhood improvements; holy @#$# that's a lot for the West Toronto Railpath,

View attachment 532495

Next: (comment) - @sunnyraytoronto will make note of the Beecroft Extension funding times; looks like John Street has slipped back to 2025 and many future years..... that is really inefficient.
Some of our Junctionites or those adjacent such as @ProjectEnd, @AlbertC and @smably will note the Dundas/Dupont/Annette project starting in 2025
@mburrrrr will note the Lower Yonge improvements, and I suspect @DSC will follow these as well.
@interchange42 will believe in the long promised Legion Road underpass after it opens and not a day sooner.
Raising my own eyebrow at the very marginal sums allocated to YongeTOmorrow.

View attachment 532496

*****

Below are projects for which Transportation currently lacks money to deliver.

View attachment 532497
What's the Dundas/Annette/Dupont project?? First I've heard of it...
 
What's the Dundas/Annette/Dupont project?? First I've heard of it...

Not sure. I know ideas have been bandied about it the past as to how to regularize the intersection a bit, but I haven't seen this as a budget line item recently that I can recall. So not sure what it is that they have in mind.
 
But members here are already raising questions, rightfully so about some project inflation.............and there will be more questions by the time I'm finished publishing my budget thoughts.
I’m stunned at one that you brought up: that the West Toronto Railpath is $148M. With project inflation like this it’s no wonder that the capital budget backlog is ballooning. At this rate we’ll never be able to maintain anything we build. Ever.
 
I’m stunned at one that you brought up: that the West Toronto Railpath is $148M. With project inflation like this it’s no wonder that the capital budget backlog is ballooning. At this rate we’ll never be able to maintain anything we build. Ever.

Doubling is a lot but it seems that a 50% increase over 2 years is in line with private sector. What's interesting is while prices have gone up everywhere, they've gone up far more in Toronto (not Ottawa so it's not an Ontario thing) than elsewhere. Is this partly an effect of tendering 4 subway lines and a massive commuter rail project simultaneously?


Though some materials with a very large 2-year price increase were abnormally cheap in 2021 rather than hugely expensive now.


I was hunting for a recent MTO Construction Inflation rate report but can't seem to find one.
 
Last edited:
Doubling is a lot but it seems that a 50% increase over 2 years is in line with private sector.
More than doubling! The railpath budget has increased by 181% over two years, from $53 million in 2022 to $148 million in 2024:
 
I am not looking forward to hearing from people who should know better (i.e. worked with Tory) about this budget ...
If there are 'efficiencies' to be found, why didn't you find them when you were running Council?
The Star's first budget piece is up; it adds little substance except to say that Councillor Burnside has decided to align w/Cllr. Holyday as a contrarian:

View attachment 532371

From: https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/to...cle_a093c35e-af2d-11ee-a7b7-2706a05486c7.html
I disagree with him, but I do appreciate that Burnside is upfront with what he wants to cut - often a problem with commentators at budget time!
 

Back
Top