News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.8K     0 

I agree. If McGuinty had quickly pulled the plug on Ford's subway for everywhere plan at the same time Ford claimed to have loads of gravy to be redirected to subways and private investors ready to pay for subways out of pocket, then there would be a whole lot of people saying that it was unnecessary. There would be a whole lot of angry people out there that would actually believe that the only reason loads of subway cash didn't materialize was that Ford was prevented from carrying out his gravy redirection and private money plan. People, for whatever reason, believed that Ford was telling them the facts and that he, as a straight talker who was on the inside as a councillor, was the guy who was going to prove every stereotype of inefficient government and monetary waste correct and then fix it. The only way to let that belief die is to let things pan out as they have.
 
I don't know who I should be angrier at, Ford or McGuinty.

From a political standpoint it is hard to blame McGuinty. Mayors generally do not fall from a large majority of population supporting them so quickly.

Miller made it 7 years before losing a vote of significance in council. Lastman made it through both terms (~5 years) and probably would have been re-elected in 2003 if he ran.

Ford's MOU would have passed within 60 minutes at any council meetings before December 2011. I don't see how McGuinty could have predicted such a massive mishandling of that file.
 
Last edited:
Lastman made it through both terms (~5 years) and probably would have been re-elected in 2003 if he ran.

Ford's MOU would have passed within 60 minutes at any council meetings before December 2011. I don't see how McGuinty could have predicted such a massive mishandling of that file.

I think you've got rose-coloured glasses on when you look at Mayor Mel at the end of his term. He was a spent force, exhausted and ill. He would not have survived if he had ran.

Agreed on Ford's crazy self-defenestration -- but his stubborness knows no bounds. I shudder to think of what he does next.
 
I think you've got rose-coloured glasses on when you look at Mayor Mel at the end of his term. He was a spent force, exhausted and ill. He would not have survived if he had ran.

Yes, he opted not to run because of health issues.

I had intended that statement to show what might have happened if he was in good health allowing him to run for and serve a 3rd term.

McGuinty had good reason so assume that Ford's popularity would last for 5+ years at the time the decision was made.
 
But the Hurontario LRT won't do anything for Halton, York, or Durham Regions. Also, I don't think $950 million will be enough to build the Hurontario LRT, will it?

Halton, York, Durham? Peel has a population of over a million without any rapid transit, I think Peel should take priority over the smaller regions.

As for the amount of money, Mississauga and Brampton could contribute some funding. Unlike Toronto, I doubt we'd rely on the province to pay everything for us.
 
As for the amount of money, Mississauga and Brampton could contribute some funding. Unlike Toronto, I doubt we'd rely on the province to pay everything for us.

What is the funding split for the Mississauga Transitway? I don't actually know the answer to this, but it seems like a good way of proving your point.
 
What is the funding split for the Mississauga Transitway? I don't actually know the answer to this, but it seems like a good way of proving your point.
1/3, 1/3, 1/3. It's exactly the same deal that was announced at the same time as what Toronto got ... 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 on the Spadina subway extension.
 
Didn't know where to put this nor have I seen this posted anywhere on UT but Transit Toronto has pictures of a rough mock up (plywood and starboard) of the LRT cars.
Upon first glance they are bigger and bulkier than the new streetcars.

http://transit.toronto.on.ca/streetcar/4513.shtml

lrt-mockup-01.jpg
 
Yes, he opted not to run because of health issues.

I had intended that statement to show what might have happened if he was in good health allowing him to run for and serve a 3rd term.

This is way, way OT, but I feel compelled to remind you that during his last term Mel was (1) definitively proven to have been a deadbeat dad to his illegitmate children and (2) implicated in corruption scandals, including the MFP scandal for which a judicial inquiry was conducted during the mayoral campaign. I suspect that the mud from both those (and who knows what other) scandals would have fallen much more squarely on Mel's face had he been running.

All that said, our sagacious citizenry recently elected Rob Ford as its mayor, so one cannot say with any certainty that Mel would have lost. But he would have had a difficult time.
 
Didn't know where to put this nor have I seen this posted anywhere on UT but Transit Toronto has pictures of a rough mock up (plywood and starboard) of the LRT cars.
Upon first glance they are bigger and bulkier than the new streetcars.

http://transit.toronto.on.ca/streetcar/4513.shtml

lrt-mockup-01.jpg

Why does this not look like the renderings? I LIKED the renderings.

THIS looks FUG (although it does look more ... "substantial" I guess you could say).
 
Didn't know where to put this nor have I seen this posted anywhere on UT but Transit Toronto has pictures of a rough mock up (plywood and starboard) of the LRT cars.
Upon first glance they are bigger and bulkier than the new streetcars.

http://transit.toronto.on.ca/streetcar/4513.shtml

lrt-mockup-01.jpg

I really wish they could have had a couple of these running along the existing streetcar routes during the transit debate. They may not be the exact same vehicles as TC will use, but "it's close enough for jazz". People would have seen that the new vehicles have more in common with subway trains than they do with the existing streetcars.

It may have made Rob Ford's references to "streetcars" seem like less of a big deal.
 
Why does this not look like the renderings? I LIKED the renderings.

THIS looks FUG (although it does look more ... "substantial" I guess you could say).

Maybe because it's not intended for public consumption and is being built to test design concepts?

Maybe subway schleppers like you ought to wait a bit first before dismissing everything LRT-related.
 
Last edited:
Maybe because it's not intended for public consumption and is being built to test design concepts?

Maybe subway schleppers like you ought to wait a bit first before dismissing everything LRT-related.

Did you even read my post, like at all?
 
On Wed Agenda
[QUOTEEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Board of Directors is being asked to receive and endorse this staff report on moving forward
with all four Toronto transit projects – Eglinton, Scarborough, Sheppard and Finch. In moving
forward, Metrolinx will use Infrastructure Ontario on all projects, as directed by Treasury Board, to
maximize value and increase certainty of on-time, on-budget delivery, subject to the completion of
value-for-money analysis on each project. Staff is recommending that construction continue where
it is already underway, such as the tunnel launch shaft for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT, and that
we move to fulfill the original promise of delivering these projects by 2020.
RECOMMENDATION
RESOLVED:
1. THAT, subject to any approvals required from the Province of Ontario, Metrolinx is authorized to
proceed with the implementation of the Toronto Transit Plan as originally approved by Metrolinx
on May 19, 2010, consisting of the following projects, (the “Projects), with the following staging:
 the Eglinton Crosstown LRT from the Jane Street / Black Creek area to Kennedy
Station with an in-service date of 2020,
 the Scarborough RT / Sheppard LRT maintenance and storage facility, with a
construction start of 2013 and substantial completion in 2016,
 the Scarborough RT replacement and extension to Sheppard Avenue, with a
construction start of 2014 and an in-service date of 2019,
 the Sheppard East LRT from Don Mills Station to east of Morningside Avenue, with a
construction start of 2014 and an in-service date of 2018; and,
 the Finch West LRT from the Toronto-York-Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE) to
Humber College, with a construction start date of 2015 and an in-service date of 2019.
2. THAT, Metrolinx staff is authorized to finalize and execute definitive legal agreements with the
City and the TTC relating to the funding and implementation of the Projects at a capped
contribution of $8.4 billion in 2010 dollars.
3. THAT, the principles outlined in Metrolinx’s letter to the Chair of the Toronto Transit Commission
dated January 31, 2012 attached as Appendix I to this report shall be reflected in the definitive
legal agreements relating to the funding and implementation of the Projects.
Page 2 of 8
4. THAT, subject to positive value-for-money analysis results and Treasury Board approval,
Metrolinx will use Infrastructure Ontario for project delivery to the extent feasible in accordance
with letter from Ontario Minister of Transportation to Metrolinx Chair dated April 19th, 2012
attached as Appendix II, in order to optimize the value for money to the Ontario taxpayer on
these transit investments.
5. THAT, in conjunction with an IO project delivery approach, Metrolinx staff work with the federal
government to seek additional P3 Canada Fund support for these projects.
6. THAT, after consultation with the TTC and Infrastructure Ontario, staff report back to the Board
with opportunities for early works packages that can advance the projects without reducing
overall value-for-money from the preferred delivery approach.
7. THAT, Metrolinx funding and implementation of the Projects is contingent on the PRESTO fare
card being implemented by the TTC, and,
8. THAT, after consultation with the City of Toronto and the TTC, staff report back to the Board with
details on the updated budget and scope for the Projects.
BACKGROUND
On March 21-22, 2012, the City Council completed its deliberations on Metrolinx Light Rail Transit
Projects for Toronto (Appendix III). Council endorsed an approach which re-affirmed, in large
measure, the projects contained in Metrolinx’s original plan. The following is a chronology of key
changes to the scope of the Projects.
On May 19, 2010, Metrolinx adopted the original plan that included four LRT projects in the City of
Toronto including:
 the Eglinton Crosstown LRT from Jane Street to Kennedy Station.
 the Scarborough RT conversion to LRT from Kennedy Station to Sheppard Avenue.
 the Sheppard East LRT from Don Mills Station to east of Morningside Avenue.
 the Finch West LRT from the Toronto-York-Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE) to
Humber College.
On March 31, 2011, the Mayor of Toronto, Minister of Transportation and Chair of Metrolinx signed
a MoU for a revised transit plan for Toronto. The MoU included the Eglinton-Scarborough
Crosstown transit project, underground from Jane / Black Creek to Kennedy Station, continuing in
the Scarborough RT (SRT) alignment to Scarborough City Centre as the responsibility of Metrolinx,
and the Sheppard Subway extensions, west to Downsview Station and east to Scarborough City
Centre and enhanced bus service on Finch Avenue as the responsibility of the City of Toronto,
subject to receiving support from their respective organizations.
On January 31, 2012, the Metrolinx Chair sent a letter to Mayor Ford and TTC Chair Stintz
encouraging Mayor Ford and Chair Stintz to confirm their position on a transit plan in Toronto at
the earliest possible date. The letter also restates the five principles that guided the negotiations of
the MoU between the Province, Mayor and Metrolinx, as they continue to reflect the provincial
interest and the mandate given to Metrolinx (the letter is attached as Appendix I).
On February 8, 2012, Council affirmed its support for the Metrolinx original plan, approved by the
Metrolinx Board at its meeting on May 19, 2010, with the one exception being Sheppard Avenue
East, which was left for decision at a future date following advice from the expert panel.
Page 3 of 8
On March 21-22, 2012, Council considered the report of the expert panel on Sheppard Avenue
East. The expert panel recommended that Council proceed with LRT on Sheppard Avenue from
Don Mills Station to east of Morningside Avenue. After debate, Council adopted the
recommendation and forwarded it to Metrolinx and the Province for review.
On April 19, 2012, Metrolinx received a letter from the Minister of Transportation (Appendix II)
reiterating the Provincial policy related to project delivery that is articulated in the Province’s longterm
infrastructure plan, Building Together. As part of this plan, the government adopted a policy
of making greater use of AFP through Infrastructure Ontario (IO) to procure the province’s
infrastructure. The letter notes that all provincial infrastructure projects in excess of $50 million will
be subject to recommendations by the Ministry of Infrastructure to government regarding project
delivery and procurement method, and the need to consult with IO to determine whether and how
they can assist with procurement. In the letter, the Minister advises that Metrolinx is to develop its
revised implementation plan anticipating the use of AFP for project delivery in all cases, subject to
the completion of value-for-money analysis on the individual projects and Treasury Board
approval.
DISCUSSION
Previous Council Decision
On February 8, 2012, Council adopted a motion on the Metrolinx Transit Projects in Toronto with a
25-18 vote in favour of a plan that is similar to the original plan approved by the Metrolinx Board at
its meeting on May 19, 2010. In summary, the Council motion supports:
• the Eglinton Crosstown LRT from Jane Street to Kennedy Station.
• the Scarborough RT conversion to LRT from Kennedy Station to Sheppard Avenue.
• the Finch West LRT from the Toronto-York-Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE) to
Humber College.
The one exception is transit on the Sheppard Avenue corridor, for which council directed the
creation of an expert panel to advise Council, not later than March 21, 2012.
After completion of a detailed evaluation of options, the Panel concluded that LRT is the
recommended mode of transit for Sheppard Avenue East. With the exception of Dr. Gordon
Chong, a strong consensus existed among the Panel members that the LRT was superior to the
subway options presented, across the range of assessment criteria under consideration. A
summary of the Expert Panel Report is attached in Appendix IV.
After receipt and debate of the report, on March 22, 2012, Council recommended the LRT option
as its preferred transit investment for Sheppard Avenue East.
Metrolinx Staff Comment
The recommended plan endorsed by City Council in large measure returns to the original Metrolinx
plan endorsed by the Metrolinx Board on May 19, 2010. The Metrolinx approved plan included
construction of four LRT projects and one York Region Viva BRT program in corridors identified as
Top 15 priorities in the Metrolinx Regional Transportation Plan, The Big Move. As the largest
single investment in public transit in Canadian history, the plan represented an aggressive, bold
and doable program. The plan included proceeding with three projects immediately, Sheppard
LRT, Eglinton LRT and York Viva, with Scarborough RT and Finch LRT commencing construction
in 2015.
Page 4 of 8
The plan endorsed by City Council represents a departure from the MoU that was negotiated with
the Mayor of Toronto. The MoU provided that Metrolinx would deliver a fully grade separated LRT
along the Eglinton-Scarborough RT alignment from the Jane/Black Creek area to McCowan in the
Scarborough City Centre, while the City would deliver subway extensions in the Sheppard corridor,
and enhanced bus service on the Finch corridor. However, the MoU obligated all parties to receive
support from their respective organizations, which for the Mayor, meant that the plan needed
endorsement from Council. This has not been achieved.
Metrolinx staff recommends that the Board support City Council’s endorsement of the revised plan,
which is reflective of the original plan endorsed by the Metrolinx Board of Directors. The revised
transit plan for Toronto evaluated against Metrolinx stated principles achieves the following:
 consistent with regional needs identified in The Big Move:
o links regional urban growth centres
o provides new east west connections
o connects communities of social need
o locates transit to support future growth
o high level of readiness relative to other regional projects
o centres of population and employment served.
 each of the four Toronto light rail projects are identified as a Top 15 Priority.
 sound transit planning principles are met with previous Metrolinx studies and approved
Environmental Assessments by City Council and Ministry of Environment for all four
projects.
 meets $8.4 billion provincial funding and asset ownership and control criteria that allows for
amortization of costs.
 minimizes penalties and avoids sunk costs.
 minimizes cost of delay to light rail vehicle contract, but actual cost impact still needs to be
negotiated with vehicle supplier.
 impacts to traffic are limited:
o Scarborough fully separated from traffic
o Sheppard and Finch to be widened; some intersection adjustments required
o Along Eglinton, east of Leslie, all general use lanes to be maintained; HOV lanes
will be removed to accommodate the LRT in median; some intersection
adjustments required.
Budget and Scope
Eglinton Crosstown LRT
Over the past year, significant progress has been made on the implementation of the Eglinton
Crosstown LRT. Major project delivery achievements to date include:
 initiated construction on the west tunnel launch site at Eglinton Avenue West and Black
Creek Drive;
 completed design of the west tunnel from Black Creek drive to Yonge Street;
 initiated design for seven stations between Black Creek Drive and Yonge Street;
 held public consultations for Bathurst Station, Dufferin Station, Eglinton West (Allen)
Station;
 purchased property for the proposed vehicle maintenance and storage facility on the former
Kodak Lands;
 conducted extensive geotechnical testing and investigation work;
 ordered the tunnel liners;
Page 5 of 8
 ordered the tunnel boring machines; and
 ordered the light rail vehicles.
The approved schedule for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT is 2010-2020. As noted above,
construction and engineering are well underway for the project and it is expected to be completed
on the 2020 timeline.
The project has a total length of 19 kilometres, of which approximately 11 kilometres will be located
in a tunnel. The line has a forecasted 2031 ridership of 5,400 people per hour in the peak direction
(PPHPD) in 2031. Forecasted passenger volumes are within the range of capacity for a LRT
system.
The previous budget for Eglinton was estimated at $4.9 billion in 2010 dollars. These costs will
need to be reviewed to reflect potential changes to scope, including a grade separation option
through the Black Creek area. Metrolinx staff plan to report back to the Board of Directors at the
June meeting on the proposed alignment in the Black Creek area and the western terminus for this
phase of the project.
Scarborough RT
This project involves the replacement of the Scarborough RT with a LRT and its extension from
McCowan to Sheppard. The total length of the project is 9.9 kilometres and it is forecasted to carry
approximately 10,000 pphpd, within the capacity of a LRT.
Major project delivery milestones to date for the Scarborough RT include completion of design for
the replacement of the SRT to 30 percent and completed design for Kennedy Station to 10
percent. Design for the extension component of the SRT, between McCowan and Sheppard will
need to be restarted.
The previous plan included a construction schedule for the Scarborough RT of 2015-2020. The
schedule allows for the SRT to be in service during the Pan Am/Parapan Games in the summer of
2015, after which the service would be shut down for construction. Planning, design and
engineering work will be completed prior to construction in order to minimize down time.
The revised plan will move up SRT completion by one year from 2020 to 2019. This would be
accomplished by starting work on the extension of the line between McCowan and Sheppard as a
first phase, allowing the existing service to continue until after the Pan Am/Parapan Games are
completed.
The budget for the SRT was estimated at $1.8 billion in 2010 dollars.
Sheppard East LRT
This project involves a new LRT line from the Don Mills station on the Sheppard subway line to
Morningside, a distance of 12 kilometres. Forecasted ridership to 2031 is 3,000 pphpd, well within
the capacity of a LRT.
Metrolinx and the TTC are currently completing construction of the Agincourt grade separation at
Sheppard Avenue and the GO Stouffville rail line. The grade separation target completion date is
June 2012. In addition, Metrolinx acquired property for a combined SRT and Sheppard East LRT
maintenance and storage facility at Conlins Road. Site preparation work, including the relocation
of underground utilities, has been completed. Finally, procurement for the maintenance facility,
which was to be a design-build-finance-maintain project in collaboration with Infrastructure Ontario,
is currently on hold and will need to be reactivated.
Page 6 of 8
The original approved plan included a construction schedule for the Sheppard East LRT of 2010-
2014. With the exception of work at the Agincourt grade separation and site grading of the Conlins
yard property, no work has progressed on this project for more than a year.
The revised plan includes working with the IO delivery model, subject to a value-for-money
analysis and Treasury Board approval, by 2018.
The budget for the project was estimated at $950 million in 2010 dollars, including a one-third
contribution from the federal government.
Finch West LRT
The original approved plan called for implementation of the Finch West LRT project in the 2015-
2020 period. This project involves a new LRT line from the Finch West station on the Toronto-York
Spadina Subway extension to Humber College, a distance of 11 kilometres. Forecasted ridership
to 2031 is 2,800 pphpd, well within the capacity of a LRT.
Metrolinx and the TTC will need to review the current status of all Finch West LRT work, evaluate
and update the cost estimates and prepare an value for money analysis for an IO delivery model.
The anticipated completion date will be in 2019.
Project Staging
Considerations
The Eglinton Crosstown LRT is currently under construction. Ensuring construction momentum is
not lost on this critical project is an essential consideration. Time is required to bring additional
project management, design and engineering resources on board. Maintaining schedule on
Eglinton is a key consideration, other considerations include:
• Vehicle deliveries
o the ability to receive and test vehicles will reduce delay and other costs associated
with the vehicle contract
• Industry capacity in responding to multiple procurements
o we must be mindful of industry capacity to respond to multiple concurrent
opportunities
o engineering may be a challenging area, although the size and scale of these
offerings is expected to draw resources from around the world
• SRT replacement is a priority
o The SRT has high, established ridership; it is near the end of its economic life and in
need of replacement. Project acceleration has benefits and staging can be done to
avoid any disruptions during the Pan Am / Parapan Games period
• Deliver all projects through Alternative Finance and Procurement (AFP)
o Provincial policy requires making greater use of Alternative Financing and
Procurement (AFP) through IO to procure the province’s infrastructure, and in
particular that provincial projects over $50 million be considered for AFP delivery,
subject to value-for-money analysis and Treasury Board approval.
Page 7 of 8
Staff Recommended Project Staging
It is recommended that the Projects be staged for construction in the following manner:
Eglinton Crosstown LRT:
• Continue with Design Bid Build tenders for tunnel construction starting in late summer of
2012
• Proceed with IO delivery for the balance of the Eglinton project
• Projected in-service date of 2020
Scarborough RT / Sheppard East LRT Yard:
• Continue with the Design-Build-Finance-Maintain (DBFM) selection process started last
year
• Provides early storage and testing site for vehicles
• Minimizes delays to vehicle supplier
• Avoids break fees if procurement is cancelled
• Projected in-service date of 2015 (Phase 1 for vehicle deliveries), 2016 (substantial
completion)
Sheppard East LRT:
• Proceed with IO delivery
• Projected in-service date of 2018
Scarborough RT:
• Proceed with IO delivery
• Separate early works as Design-Bid-Build (DBB)for track along Sheppard Avenue, from the
yard to Progress Avenue for vehicle testing
• Initial construction would be on extension from McCowan to Sheppard Avenue
• Existing system shut down for replacement after Pan Am / Parapan Games
• Projected in-service date of 2019
Finch West LRT:
• Complete design work to 30% to facilitate AFP procurement
• Build underground access connections to Toronto-York-Spadina Subway extension
(TYSSE) immediately
• Projected in-service date of 2019
Return to the Board
Considering the foregoing, staff recommends proceeding with the necessary work to implement
the Projects, and that after further consultation with the City of Toronto, TTC and Infrastructure
Ontario, reporting back to the Board with details on any updates to project budget and scope.
In addition, after consultation with the TTC and Infrastructure Ontario, staff will report back to the
Board with opportunities for early works packages that can advance the projects without reducing
overall value-for-money from the preferred delivery approach.
Page 8 of 8
PRESTO Implementation
The region-wide implementation of the PRESTO fare card is an important goal for Metrolinx. The
electronic fare card is now in place on all GO Transit services and municipal operators throughout
the GTHA. Good progress has been made on a Master Agreement for the implementation of
PRESTO across the entire TTC system. Moving forward with the PRESTO fare card system
should be a condition of any agreement with the City and the TTC.
Alternative Finance and Procurement
Infrastructure Ontario’s alternative financing and procurement (AFP) model has a proven track
record of successfully delivering large complex infrastructure projects, on time and on budget.
The IO model allows for the private sector to design and construct the facility, subject to strict
parameters and required outcomes. In the end, the benefits of private sector innovation can be
incorporated into a public works project that remains a public asset after construction completion.
Given this strong record, IO is participating in the procurement of the Metrolinx Air Rail Link Spur
project (design-build-finance), the Ottawa LRT project (design-build-finance-maintain) and the
Waterloo LRT project (design-build-finance-operate-maintain). This is consistent with the
province’s long-term infrastructure plan, Building Together.
AFP projects are guided by five key principles including transparency, value-for-money, public
ownership and public control, and that public interest is paramount. With projects as significant as
these Toronto transit projects, Metrolinx must look at all delivery options in order to achieve the
best value for taxpayer money.
Metrolinx is prepared to proceed with the IO delivery model, with the exception of some early
contract packages on Eglinton Crosstown, such as tunnel boring machines, tunneling and early
works contracts, pending the successful completion of value-for-money assessments for each of
the projects and subject to approvals required by the Metrolinx Board and Province.
The delivery model will not affect the customer experience as each of the lines will be operated as
seamless components of the TTC network.
BUDGET POSITION
Subject to Provincial Cabinet approval to reaffirm the Toronto Transit Plan as modified by more
definitive agreements, the maximum budget authorized for the plan is $8.4 billion in 2010 dollars.
Respectfully submitted,
Jack J. Collins
Vice President, Rapid Transit Implementation
Direct Dial: 416-874-5904
Fax: 416-874-5901
E-mail: jack.collins@metrolinx.com
____________________________
Attachments
Appendix I – Metrolinx letter to TTC Chair (January 31, 2012)
Appendix II – Minister’s Letter to Metrolinx Chair (April 19th, 2012)
Appendix III – City Council Resolutions (February 8 and March 21-22, 2012)
Appendix IV – Toronto City Council Sheppard Avenue Expert Panel Report Summary
APPENDIX I - Metrolinx Letter to Mayor and TTC Chair
APPENDIX I - Metrolinx Letter to Mayor and TTC Chair
APPENDIX II - Minister's Letter to Metrolinx Chair
APPENDIX II - Minister's Letter to Metrolinx Chair
~IORONTO Joseph P. Pennachetti
City Manager
City Hall
11th Floor, Easl Tower
100 Queen Street West
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2
Tel: 416-392-3551
Fax: 416-392-1827
jpennac@toronto.ca
www.toronto.ca
April 19, 2012
Mr. Bruce McCuaig
President and Chief Executive Officer
Metrolinx
20 Bay St. Suite 600
Toronto, ON M5J 2W3
Dear Mr. McCuaig
Toronto City Council approved the Metrolinx 5 in 10 Light Rail Transit projects at the February 8 and
March 21-22, 2012 Special meetings of Council, as follows.
" Toronto City Council affirm its support for the light rail transit (LRT) priority plan for Toronto
consistent with the Metrolinx "5 in 10" plan as presented to the Metrolinx Board at its meeting
on May 19, 2010 and the early implementation of the following projects:
• The Finch West LRT from the Spadina Subway extension to Humber College.
• The Eglinton Crosstown LRT from Jane Street to Kennedy Station.
• The Scarborough RT conversion to LRT from Kennedy Station to Sheppard Avenue,
with an extension to the Malvern Town Centre as funds become available."
"City Council confirm that Light Rail Transit (LRT) is the preferred rapid transit mode for
Sheppard Avenue East from Don Mills to Morningside, and confirm the Sheppard Avenue
East LRT as a priority line within the approved Metrolinx "5 in 10" plan."
Attached for your information are the complete Council directives from the two special meetings on
transit expansion.
The City looks forward to continued discussion with Metrolinx to achieve a Master Agreement for the
approved rapid transit projects in Toronto, in addition to pursuing a long term transit and funding
strategy that serves the needs of Toronto and the region.
Yours truly,
APPENDIX III-City Council Resolutions
APPENDIX III-City Council Resolutions
APPENDIX III-City Council Resolutions
APPENDIX III-City Council Resolutions
APPENDIX III-City Council Resolutions
APPENDIX III-City Council Resolutions
APPENDIX III-City Council Resolutions
Toronto City Council Sheppard Avenue Expert Panel Report Summary
As noted above, the expert panel was formed after the February 8, 2012 Council meeting. The
panel’s mandate was to:
“…advise City Council on the most effective means of delivering rapid transit to
the greatest number of riders with the funds currently allocated and with
projected funds, and will report on other potential funding sources that could
augment funds for public transportation on Sheppard…”
Members of the panel included the following:
 David Crombie Chair, Toronto Lands Corporation
 Professor Eric Miller Director, Cities Centre, University of Toronto
 Dr. Gordon Chong CEO, Toronto Transit Infrastructure Ltd.
 Mitzie Hunter CEO, Greater Toronto CivicAction Alliance
 Prabha Khosla Chair, Toronto Women’s City Alliance
 Israt Ahmed Community Planner – Scarborough, Toronto Social Planning
 Ernie McCullough Executive Director, Sheppard East Village BIA
Metrolinx and TTC provided senior staff support to the panel (Jack Collins, Vice-President,
Rapid Transit Implementation was the Metrolinx representative), in order to provide background
facts and information to assist the panel in its deliberations. Metrolinx staff was not formal
members of the expert panel.
The report of the panel was published on March 15, 2012. The panel considered three options
for evaluation against nine separate criteria. The options included:
• LRT from Don Mills to east of Morningside Avenue,
• subway from Don Mills to Scarborough Centre, and
• a hybrid of subway from Don Mills to Victoria Park and LRT from Victoria Park to east of
Morningside Avenue.
These options were measured against three broad groups of criteria, including:
Funding and Economic Development
• Economic Development: consider consistency with the City’s Official Plan, including
corridor density, population and employment growth plans. Other factors to consider
include relieving the economic costs of gridlock, supporting economic uplift (i.e. job
creations), in addition to associated impacts on property values in the area.
• Cost effectiveness and fiscal sustainability: consider minimizing short and long
term operating and capital costs of the project including the costs of the state of good
repair. The option must also consider the long term fiscal sustainability of the transit
system as a whole.
• Timeframe: meet the timelines required to provide a clear response to the provincial
directive.
APPENDIX IV -- Toronto City Council Sheppard Avenue Expert Panel Report Summary
Transit Service
• Ridership: provide the necessary capacity to meet expected ridership demand in
2031.
• Network Connectivity: provide a transit line that supports better connections with the
transit system, improves overall access and network capacity.
• Level of Service: consider the door to door travel time of the end users, including outof-
vehicle time (walk, wait and transfer times) in addition to in-vehicle time.
Sustainability and Social Impact
• Equity and Accessibility: contribute to improved equity and accessibility across
several dimensions including gender, income, race, age, and ability, in order to
improve:
o social cohesion and access to opportunity;
o transit safety and mobility;
o end user affordability (e.g., fares);
o equity in access to rapid transit across the city
• Environmental Sustainability: support long term environmental sustainability
objectives, including addressing resource and environmental challenges such as
climate change and higher gas prices, while also supporting healthy and vibrant
communities.
• Community impact: consider the impact on the local community taking into
account:
o construction timelines
o community acceptance of local intensification
o impacts on housing affordability
o other impacts on residents and businesses (i.e., traffic, place-making
potential, etc.)
The Panel assessed each option according to the nine criteria and scored the options on a
scale of 1 to 5 (1 = lowest, 5 = highest). The Panel also weighed each criteria group. The
option with the highest score provides the best transit option for the Sheppard Avenue east
corridor based on the assessment criteria determined by the Panel.
APPENDIX IV -- Toronto City Council Sheppard Avenue Expert Panel Report Summary
Summary Table of Panel Scores
Criteria Option A:
LRT: Don Mills to
Morningside
Option B:
Subway: Don
Mills to
Scarborough
Centre
Option C:
Subway: Don Mills
to Victoria Park
LRT: Victoria Park
to Morningside
Funding and Economic Development
Economic development 3.71 4.14 3.57
Cost effectiveness and fiscal sustainability 4.43 2.14 2.57
Timeframe 5.00 1.86 2.29
Transit Service
Ridership 4.57 2.29 2.71
Network connectivity 4.71 3.14 3.29
Level of service 4.14 3.57 3.29
Sustainability and Social Impact
Equity and accessibility 4.57 3.14 3.14
Environmental sustainability 4.14 3.57 3.43
Community impact 3.86 3.57 2.86
Total Unweighted Score (out of 45) 39.14 27.43 27.14
Total Weighted Score (out of 100) 87.3 59.3 59.5
After completion of a detailed evaluation of options, the Panel concluded that LRT is the
recommended mode of transit for Sheppard Avenue east. With the exception of Dr. Gordon
Chong, a strong consensus exists among the Panel members that the LRT is superior to the
subway options presented, across the range of assessment criteria under consideration.
After receipt and debate of the report, Council recommended the LRT option as its preferred
transit investment for Sheppard Avenue east.][/QUOTE]
 

Back
Top