News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
 6.7K     0 
DP for demo and new build at 11425 124 Street:

Major Development Permit
Reference Id:Job No 495106151-002
Description:Construction of (a) new building(s), Demolition
Location:11425 - 124 STREET NW
Plan RN46 Blk 22 Lot 15
Applicant:SPAN ARCHITECTURE INC
Status:Intake Review
Create Date:2023/12/22
Neighbourhood:INGLEWOOD
 
Not sure if this one has a thread. But this is the Leston project on 103ave in Oliver.
5235C201-B529-4EBD-A5B9-7D40AC9710EF.jpeg
 
Wasn't there originally a multifamily proposal for this site? I celebrate disappearance of empty lots as well, but not if they're developed into what is essentially a modern gas station, which I assume will have extensive surface parking. We have enough surface parking in the core that can be retrofitted to accommodate EV charging without needing to use lots that have a lot more potential like this one.
 
EtoV said:
Wasn't there originally a multifamily proposal for this site? I celebrate disappearance of empty lots as well, but not if they're developed into what is essentially a modern gas station, which I assume will have extensive surface parking. We have enough surface parking in the core that can be retrofitted to accommodate EV charging without needing to use lots that have a lot more potential like this one.
Click to expand...

Multifamily site is just south of this. (Another empty lot disappearing!)
 
From what I can see, this is going to be like a pseudo Rec Room with an indoor trampoline park area, playground, bowling lanes, restaurant, arcade and batting cages on the roof (it's also a DER special!):

1704492942337.png


1704492967177.png
 
Avenuer said:
From what I can see, this is going to be like a pseudo Rec Room with an indoor trampoline park area, playground, bowling lanes, restaurant, arcade and batting cages on the roof (it's also a DER special!):

View attachment 531677

View attachment 531678
Click to expand...
Near the old “Bullwinkles,” why can’t they just re-incarnate that place instead?
 
EtoV said:
We really need to start requiring parking lots be located behind the building at the very least.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the development looks rough. I'd be fine with a simple LVT that would most likely solve the problem for us without coming off as "anti-car".
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top