News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
Ok, what’s this building now? Address just says University Ave.

IMG_2279.png

IMG_2280.png
 
There are several projects that are moving forward that have my heart atwitter and my inner eye aglow -- Maclab's Parks, Qualico's Stationlands, ICE district, Falcon I and II, and Strathcona Hat project (all multi-building complexes); and the unique downtown campus buildouts for both NorQuest and MacU; and the completion of Winspear Addition.
 
I drove by this lot yesterday (4802 118 avenue) and noticed there's and excavator on site and the ground is all dug up. Looks like this Amnor Group - 118 Ave Retail Development is getting started. Nothing spectacular, but it'll be good for this area to have some new retail. There was once a gas station here, but this lot has been vacant for at least 2 decades IIRC. It was remediated a couple years ago.

Another empty lot on 118 avenue bites the dust

1734287875475.png

118 ave retail development.jpg

1734288905881.png
 
Last edited:
The city should really have urban design standards preventing parking from being located at the front of buildings on major roads.

Every city in the lower mainland manages to do it, so it shouldn't be too hard
Agreed, and I'm not asking a lot, I can live with bland design if it's not a high value location. Just take this exact same design, and put the parking behind the building and scoot the building up to the sidewalk. EZ.
 
Agreed, and I'm not asking a lot, I can live with bland design if it's not a high value location. Just take this exact same design, and put the parking behind the building and scoot the building up to the sidewalk. EZ.
So easy, and should be required. But I imagine in that case we'd end up with a dead streetfront anyway as they'd put doors in the back so people who park don't have to, *gasp*, walk around the building to get in, and businesses wouldn't want to monitor/secure 2 doors and would close up the front. 🤦‍♂️
 
So easy, and should be required. But I imagine in that case we'd end up with a dead streetfront anyway as they'd put doors in the back so people who park don't have to, *gasp*, walk around the building to get in, and businesses wouldn't want to monitor/secure 2 doors and would close up the front. 🤦‍♂️
Yup, I think that's exactly what happened with these two shops on 102ave/109st
 
The building that those two shops occupy will be slated for demolition within the next few years as part of NorQuest expansion.
Which is great, but the point remains that it's a good example of the typical Edmonton way of prioritizing parking and drivers over walkability and street interaction as a whole.
 
Which is great, but the point remains that it's a good example of the typical Edmonton way of prioritizing parking and drivers over walkability and street interaction as a whole.
Yes, it is not hard to find examples of this over the last few decades, even downtown. The Staples store on 101 St was also good example of that, but gone now and replaced by structures more pedestrian friendly.

Given the value of land, I suspect big parking lots in front are going to become less common particularly in more central areas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcr

Back
Top