Agard
Active Member
Looks like something is happening here in Rosenthal, does anyone have any info on it?
Isn't this just a bunch of more apartments? Same as west of 218stLooks like something is happening here in Rosenthal, does anyone have any info on it?
View attachment 714524
Just a little bit further west to connect to the $300 million rec center and new apartments. In my perfect world it could be elevated over the roundaboutsIsn't this just a bunch of more apartments? Same as west of 218st
Perfectly "close" and yet too far from the new 3 billion dollar LRT to not actually serve. Such planning!
When you say same as west of 218 street, do you mean the same developer or just the same type of housing? I'd love if it was the same developer because I think those Edison apartments are pretty niceIsn't this just a bunch of more apartments? Same as west of 218st
Perfectly "close" and yet too far from the new 3 billion dollar LRT to not actually serve. Such planning!
I think a stop at winterburn road would also serve a good chunk of medium density as well, and you could push the rec center station a bit further west. (In paris they run trams right through the middle of the traffic circles, if elevated is too expensive.)Just a little bit further west to connect to the $300 million rec center and new apartments. In my perfect world it could be elevated over the roundabouts
View attachment 714603
I don't see this expansion happening when you could serve all of 124th st for less money with a spur. The reality is that an elevated section along with a new TPSS is going to be prohibitively expensive. The rec center should have been placed just north of Weber Greens by Lewis Farms TC.Just a little bit further west to connect to the $300 million rec center and new apartments. In my perfect world it could be elevated over the roundabouts
View attachment 714603
It is also very short term thinking. While there is an influx of people and demand, you can get away with building something quick and cheap looking, but when that demand starts to slow people will become more choosy about where they want to live and will pick nicer places instead. You can already start to see rental vacancy going up, projects need to be designed to be viable for decades in potentially different markets not just the current one.^^ It reminds me of the era of the 2 & 3-storey walk-ups of the 60s and 70s (a previous time of rapid population expansion in Edmonton)... a hideous collage of urban ugliness -- and the same arguments are heard today: they are necessary to meet a strong rental demand; the City needs to grow more with an intensified core densification; it will help the City Admin and many of their programs with population consolidation in the core; quality architecture is the least important of these goals. And most just don't seem to care, particularly those in the development game who are armed with abundant excuses in justification of this horror.




