News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
More context re: affordable housing;

The City of Edmonton is offering total of 11 Surplus School Sites for developing affordable housing developments. The sites range from 1 to 1.41 hectares in size, and are zoned Medium Residential RM h16 and h23. Following sites are available in:

  • Belmont (13207 - 37 Street NW): 1.41 hectare in size zoned RM h16
  • Blue Quill (2710, 2810 - 112 Street NW): 1.40 hectare in size zoned RM h23
  • Caernarvon North (14903 - 121 Street NW): 1.40 hectare in size zoned RM h16
  • Dunluce (12030 - 162 Avenue NW): 1.00 hectare in size zoned RM h16
  • Kiniski Gardens North (4320 - 41 Avenue NW): 1.20 hectare in size zoned RM h16
  • La Perle (9611 - 189 Street NW): 1.13 hectare in size zoned RM h16
  • Lymburn (7204 - 184 Street NW): 1.40 hectare in size zoned RM h16
  • Miller (4910 Matheson Way NW): 1.34 hectare in size zoned RM h16
  • Overlanders (12770 Victoria Trail NW): 1.29 hectare in size zoned RM h16
  • Summerlea (9020, 9104 - 175 Street NW): 1.00 hectare in size zoned RM h23
  • Wedgewood Heights (1003, 1021 Wedgewood Boulevard): 1.13 hectare in size zoned RM h16
Interested applicants are encouraged to review the Surplus School Site - Program Guide.

Successful applicants will be required to obtain the development and building permits by September 2026, with construction to follow. All submissions must clearly outline their development timelines and meet the September 2026 development and building permit deadline.
The Wedgewood site (slated to be developed by an indigenous affordable housing provider) was halted by a Court of Kings Bench resolution, and there was quite a showing from residents against the sale of this site yesterday.

The sale was ultimately approved by Council, 9-4. This is one of the times I agree with the residents opposing the sale. Wedgewood has only the one park, which includes baseball diamonds, soccer, and a skating rink. That's being paved for the 60-unit Treaty 8 build. The neighborhood is a single-exfil area, and has no regular bus service. A disappointing failure to protect our urban green space, and a fundamentally lacking location for an affordable housing site.

Quite a loss for the west end.
 
The Wedgewood site (slated to be developed by an indigenous affordable housing provider) was halted by a Court of Kings Bench resolution, and there was quite a showing from residents against the sale of this site yesterday.

The sale was ultimately approved by Council, 9-4. This is one of the times I agree with the residents opposing the sale. Wedgewood has only the one park, which includes baseball diamonds, soccer, and a skating rink. That's being paved for the 60-unit Treaty 8 build. The neighborhood is a single-exfil area, and has no regular bus service. A disappointing failure to protect our urban green space, and a fundamentally lacking location for an affordable housing site.

Quite a loss for the west end.
Seems pretty clear that the majority of the park space is remaining untouched, including everything around the community league and land to the south. From what I can tell, they are losing one soccer field but the ball diamond and second soccer field are safe. Unclear where the skating rink is. Not saying it was the right decision, but the opposition made it sound like there would be no park space left at all if the sale went forward.

1771524115045.png
1771524260331.png
 
Seems pretty clear that the majority of the park space is remaining untouched, including everything around the community league and land to the south. From what I can tell, they are losing one soccer field but the ball diamond and second soccer field are safe. Unclear where the skating rink is. Not saying it was the right decision, but the opposition made it sound like there would be no park space left at all if the sale went forward.

View attachment 716445View attachment 716446
That, and there's a lot of park space just outside the neighborhood's technical boundaries.
 
Calgary has some crap being built for sure. They also have some nicer projects like these:

(The top one is what I wish mercury and cobalt had been more like)

View attachment 716378
This one is beautiful and more of what I wish we'd see. It should be the minimum standard for projects like Westrich's 106 ST or 108 ST. It's not fundamentally different than either project, but a step up in design. That's not to pick on them, those projects aren't the worst, but they're the first example that comes to mind.
 
Seems pretty clear that the majority of the park space is remaining untouched, including everything around the community league and land to the south. From what I can tell, they are losing one soccer field but the ball diamond and second soccer field are safe. Unclear where the skating rink is. Not saying it was the right decision, but the opposition made it sound like there would be no park space left at all if the sale went forward.

View attachment 716445View attachment 716446
Makes sense. I misinterpreted the PU zoning in the southern end of the park to be parking.
 
Seems pretty clear that the majority of the park space is remaining untouched, including everything around the community league and land to the south. From what I can tell, they are losing one soccer field but the ball diamond and second soccer field are safe. Unclear where the skating rink is. Not saying it was the right decision, but the opposition made it sound like there would be no park space left at all if the sale went forward.

View attachment 716445View attachment 716446
What I don’t understand on these projects is the priority being “evenly dispersing” these sorts of builds instead of aligning them with the plethora of other goals we have around sustainability, active transportation, 15min communities, and nodes.

Stony plain road needs 15 midrises to be built and has a 3 billion dollar train about to service it and a dozen major employment and medical hubs. How is that not a better location? Again, I get the equity lens of not concentrating poverty. And I certainly don’t care about exaggerated nimby claims that are veiled racism/classism. But is this the right place? 20% of most Canadians’ spending is transportation. Is car dependent affordable housing actually affordable?
 
Makes sense. I misinterpreted the PU zoning in the southern end of the park to be parking.
I believe it's actually a dry pond area for heavy rainfall events (hence the weird civil grading and why it can't be used for sports fields).

What I don’t understand on these projects is the priority being “evenly dispersing” these sorts of builds instead of aligning them with the plethora of other goals we have around sustainability, active transportation, 15min communities, and nodes.

is this the right place? 20% of most Canadians’ spending is transportation. Is car dependent affordable housing actually affordable?
Agreed. Seems like a really odd choice for this type of project, since Wedgewood is one of the least walkable and most car dependent neighbourhoods within the Henday. At least there's a nearby grocery store and bus stop nearby, but basically nothing else, including assumedly the services the residents may want to access (healthcare, social services, recreation centres, post secondaries, etc).
 
Another one bites the dust. Big fire at the abandoned Iginla Law building this morning. Apologies for the crap photos but it was too cold to open the balcony door to get some clarity. Multiple fire trucks on scene, firefighters in full gear. I'm assuming they evacuated the apartment building next door.
4021253B-3FBC-4CB3-81AE-76E25B5F8208.jpeg
9EBBF751-DF57-484B-A0D6-FABA266E8A66.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Yup. I was surprised to see nothing on the news, even just in terms of the traffic impacts, which weren't insignificant, given they closed 103 St access to 97 Ave, and obviously a big chunk of 97 Ave. They're now down to *only* 3-4 firetrucks, as far as I can see.
 

Back
Top