Towered
Superstar
On one had it's sarcasm over the constant recasting of Batman. On the other hand, I haven't seen one since Keaton left the role ... and based on the comments I've heard about his two successors, it was the right move. And also a sarcastic comment about the constant reboots. Superman Returns was a great movie, and instead of a sequel, it's being rebooted again? The Spiderman movies seemed to be going very well ... and instead yet another reboot?
What's the point of going to any of these movies, if there'll be a remake out shortly after. It's kind of like watching a Friday evening TV show on Fox ... you know it's going to be cancelled ... so what's the point.
- I think most people will agree that Keaton was a good Batman, and that Val Kilmer and George Clooney were poor replacements in pretty awful films, but the Christian Bale/Christopher Nolan combo righted the ship in a glorious manner across 3 films.
- Superman Returns was not a great film by any means. It was a misguided attempt to make a sequel of sorts to Superman II 26 years after the fact, while ignoring Superman III and IV. For anyone under the age of 30 at the time it was released, it was confusing, which is part of the reason why it also didn't make its sizeable budget back, so I don't understand why you're surprised that they're starting fresh. Reboots are by no means a recent phenomenon - Superman has been rebooted over and over since the 1940's in feature films, cartoons, and tv series. This is common with all classic, enduring pop culture characters.
- The Spider-Man movies started off well, but got worse with each one. The third one in particular was universally panned. Again, it's no surprise that it was rebooted, and the new film is of a higher quality.
I don't understand your automatic dismissal of reboots when the fact is that they are often superior to what came before.