northlands
Senior Member
^ Done purposely to mislead. This is pure garbage by the City of Edmonton and those working in CSU52 deserve better than these negotiations tactics by the City.
|
|
|
- Thread starter Airboy
- Start date
jason403
Active Member
City should just consider privitizing these jobs to avoid these excessive salaries that unions command. Would be nice to lower costs associated with these services when possible.
snowman123
New Member
As a FYI, here is the EPCOR wage increases :
Appendix I, IA & IBCSU52 Wage Summary Effective Dates:
December 20, 2020 to December 14,
20242021 – 1.00%
2022 – 1.50%
2023 – 2.75%
2024 – 3.15
%$500 bonus on successful ratification for A-Stream and SC-A Stream employees Wages are retroactive and all other terms and conditions are effective on date of ratification
Appendix I, IA & IBCSU52 Wage Summary Effective Dates:
December 20, 2020 to December 14,
20242021 – 1.00%
2022 – 1.50%
2023 – 2.75%
2024 – 3.15
%$500 bonus on successful ratification for A-Stream and SC-A Stream employees Wages are retroactive and all other terms and conditions are effective on date of ratification
Avenuer
Senior Member
'Excessive salaries'? Give me a break lol
northlands
Senior Member
More UCP crap nobody asked for.
Kosy123
Active Member
I mean do they really want the consequences of this?
Because this could essentially mean no centre-right/right wing governance in Edmonton for the next 10-20 years if they pull this. Calgary's iffy and more up in the air, but in Edmonton? They're essentially making sure future/current councillors align either with them or against them. and aligning with them brazenly and openly is bad political moves.
Then again, the UCP has been doing a lot of things that are counter-intuitive to their long term prospects in general (losing Edmonton for a generation, instituting Alberta is Calling further changing the demographics of the province that's detrimental to them 10-20 years from now)
MacLac
Senior Member
Just stay in your "lane" Danni and stick with your job description...
Whattagame
Active Member
It's the grift that keeps on grifting.
trevorhayden
Active Member
I don't necessarily think Alberta is Calling is a risk to the UCP. A lot of people who moved here came from rural and suburban parts of other provinces. I suspect these are like-minded conservatives who were already thinking of moving to Alberta.
MacLac
Senior Member
Budget is out...absolutely ZERO funding attached to the word "Edmonton"
I'm confused why YYC is getting a $90M courthouse when they just got a $350M 10 years ago
I'm confused why YYC is getting a $90M courthouse when they just got a $350M 10 years ago
Last edited:
David A
Senior Member
Maybe the Alberta advantage has now become the Alberta disadvantage with this government.
trevorhayden
Active Member
There is money for Edmonton: ROADS and lots of them -just to piss off federal Minister Guilbeault!
Gronk!
Senior Member
TAS
Senior Member
A compare and contrast of Alberta's two big city mayors in their reactions to today's budget.
Similar to the Iveson and now Sohi days versus Nenshi and Gondek, views from down south tend to be more critical and heated. Doesn't seem to negatively impact them. And some like to label Edmonton council as being too political.
Similar to the Iveson and now Sohi days versus Nenshi and Gondek, views from down south tend to be more critical and heated. Doesn't seem to negatively impact them. And some like to label Edmonton council as being too political.
bodsbods9090
Active Member
The one that gets me is they want to fund for 35,000 new spaces for students in schools but 28,000 of those will be in Calgary!
There's just as much of a demand up here for new space as there is in Calgary.
Misses the mark YET AGAIN!
There's just as much of a demand up here for new space as there is in Calgary.
Misses the mark YET AGAIN!