News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.8K     0 

matix

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
I read this article in the printed version of the star with my morning coffee saturday morning.
I can't believe, with all the red-tape these days, that this couple got screwed so bad.
I'd be talking to my lawyer about getting a day in court.

http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/columnsblogs/article/739792--aaron-suddenly-couple-s-chimney-is-illegal
Aaron: Suddenly, couple's chimney is 'illegal'
December 19, 2009 Bob Aaron
Ruta Benjamin and her husband were sitting in their house, minding their own business, when they suddenly found themselves in violation of regulations of the Technical Standards and Safety Authority without doing anything wrong.
They live near Avenue Rd. and Highway 401, where many of the older bungalows have been torn down and replaced with what she calls "monster homes."
The bungalow next to the Benjamin home was torn down 18 months ago and replaced with a large two-storey home. The City of Toronto Committee of Adjustment had approved some minor zoning variances for the new house, and the city issued a building permit for it.
Last month, when an inspector from Enbridge Gas Distribution came to complete the final safety check of the new house, the Benjamins were served with a notice of infraction. It stated that their chimney no longer complied with the fire safety regulations of the Technical Standards & Safety Authority (TSSA) because it suddenly wasn't tall enough.
They were given a deadline to raise the chimney at their own expense or have their gas supply cut off.
The strange thing is that the new house is in full compliance with the zoning bylaws and Ontario Building Code.
The height of the chimney on the Benjamin bungalow complied with all appropriate fire and gas safety rules – until the new house was built next door. Since the top of their chimney is lower than the roofline of the new house, it suddenly becomes illegal – and the Benjamins are responsible for the cost of fixing the problem.
The result is a bizarre situation where the city issued a permit for the construction of a house but the permit created an illegal situation with the older house next door. With the city and the TSSA apparently not talking to each other, the Benjamins find that the construction of the house next door has put their own house in breach of the gas safety code.
When I looked up photos of the two houses online, I could see that the top of the Benjamin chimney is about the same height as the second floor windows in the new house, and the distance separating the two houses is fairly narrow. For fire safety reasons, chimneys must be at least two feet higher than anything within 10 feet. In this case, the Benjamin chimney is considerably lower than the roofline of the new house.
Ruta Benjamin told me she has found a contractor to raise the height of their chimney for $1,500.
Benjamin emailed me, "We happen to live in the wrong house at the wrong time, and feel that the City of Toronto should not have approved the building permit due to the impact it would have on its neighbouring property, or at the very least, (should have) required that the builder cover the cost of the upgrades to our property to ensure continued compliance."
She wrote, "We can ... see other non-compliant properties just across the street."
Benjamin was told that the city regulates the building code and the province (through the TSSA) the gas delivery code, "so essentially their hands are tied."
Frankly, I find that explanation absurd. How difficult would it be for the city to require applicants for building permits to certify that adjacent properties will not be affected by fire code requirements, or if they are, to require the applicant to pay to raise the height of the neighbouring chimney?
Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer and board member of the Tarion Warranty Corp. He can be reached at bob@aaron.ca. His website: aaron.ca.
 
Bureaucracy at its finest.

BTW, my colleague got served with an infraction (big fine) for renovating his house without a permit. The interesting part was that he actually had a permit, and the person that issued the infraction was the one that had earlier approved the permit.

Of course, my colleague bitched, and he got a personal apology from the head or whatever of the department and a prompt reversal of the infraction. It seems this couple in question with the chimney issue aren't going to be so lucky.
 
Does that mean if a 10 story building was put up next door, the chimney would have to be extended to over 10 stories?



BTW. If they had switched to high-efficiency furnace and water heater, the vents would go out the sides. Unless the chimney is a fireplace chimney.
 
The city should check these things before approving the permit for the monster home.

On the other hand, the poor saps in the bungalow probably received a notice of the neighbour's building application their opportunity to object. Since they didn't object, the city might be able to weasel out of an legal penalties.

And, although it would be infuriating, $1500 in chimney work is probably a lot less than any legal action would cost. Or, better yet, get a high efficiency furnace and cash in on energy audit rebates and lower gas bills.

If the chimney was just a fireplace chimney, Enbridge would have no grounds to threaten cutting of their gas service. Enbridge is only responsible for safety as related to your gas service.
 
According to the information you gave, this nail house would have to extend its chimney over the height of the literally surrounding building.

3613761698_82a85012e6_o.jpg


or this one as well:

3614430616_8c583ca0b8_o.jpg
3614430296_17818223d2_o.jpg
 

Back
Top