Re: Terminal 1
The short of the long here is that the GTAA really missed an opportunity with respect to the amenities and retail. Architecturally the airport is fine, but take a look at any major international airport, ie: CDG-Paris, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Hong Kong, Heathrow, Vienna Int'l, they all have great retail sections, malls if you will and great food possibilities where you can sit and enjoy the flying experience.
I get the feeling that such things were not really part of the grand scheme of things for the architects or the GTAA- "get 'em out!" And I am sure I will be chastised for making these remarks, because the airport is better than anything than was there before. True enough, but when it came to excelling in the amenities department, they dropped the ball and made it the same as before.
My traveling experiences makes me believe that this is a North American phenomena-lots of airport and little of anything else. Anyone who has been to Schiphol-Amsterdam or Copenhagen knows exactly what I mean.
p5