Anyone who wants to do anything in that part of the country has to go through the Irvings.
Indeed. Atlantic conservatives are as enmeshed with the Irvings as Atlantic liberals. People in the rest of Canada have no idea the power the Irvings have out east. They practically own the maritime provinces as fiefdoms.
In this particular case though, it's not entirely clear that it was solely about the Irvings' interests putting doubt on the contract to Davie.
Project Resolve's main competitor was actually the Protecteur Class being built by Seaspan on the West Coast. It was some outside the box thinking from the naval staff and industry. Delivered at substantially lower cost and significantly reduced timeline. There was lots of support internally for Davie's proposal for a second ship. Both the Senate and the House Defence Committees also unanimously supported buying a second interim AOR. So plenty of politicians, industry experts and military staff agreed with this project. The only people that didn't were politicians representing the interests of Irving and Seaspan. With that in mind, it becomes particularly questionable to accuse VAdm Norman of breach of trust. There are so many people who had the same knowledge and even more motivation to share that information.
I have no concerns with former high ranking military members, or any retired civil servant, seeking elected office or corporate executive positions. I do have a problem when the new corporate positions engage them with government contracts and procurement without an appropriate 'cooling off' period.
There's a mandatory restricted post-employment period for most
military and
public service positions. And the further up you go, the higher the scrutiny. As it stands, there's rules on say a guy like me jumping to a defence contractor. I might be able to get clearance to take up a job, but have to avoid all business relationships with former colleagues.
I suspect one of the reasons Leslie was passed over (besides the regional and gender balancing as mentioned) was that he developed a reputation for speaking truth to power, particularly in his NDHQ/command staffing analysis. That type of critical thinking is scary to political parties.
Yep. I wish more people (especially the public) had read that
report. He slaughtered practically every sacred cow at the command level. And for that earned respect from practically anyone without the rank of general or civilian executive. He would have been an amazing reformer in any government department.
Leslie's ability to cut through the BS and call out managers and organizations for not delivering or being overly bureaucratic is amazing. Which is incredible when you consider that he navigated through the arcane maze of defence bureaucracy to the very top. We've often wondered if he was collecting complaints in his underwear drawer since he was a toddler (his paternal grandfather was Commander of the Army and Minister of National Defence and maternal grandfather was also MND). So detailed and searing was his critique of the institution....
He said what many of us wish we could say out loud and would never have the courage to say....especially at that rank. This is the equivalent of working at a company for 30 years and then calling all your senior colleagues (who are also friends of yours since college) underperformers who have failed to deliver, at your retirement party. He clearly wasn't banking on a post-employment industrial or public service career with that tone.