Tewder
Senior Member
hmmmm, some here are sounding pretty darn familyphobic.
|
|
|
hmmmm, some here are sounding pretty darn familyphobic.
What in my post led you to the conclusion I don't want refugees to be re-settled in Canada? What, in any of my posts, leads to that conclusion?
I am now, officially, confused. We were told that terrorists are not hiding in the camps where we will rescue the 25k refugees from....we were also told that between our own and the UN screening we had nothing to fear about terrorist infiltration of the refugees we are to re-settle and now, according the CBC, we are going ban single male refugees....we will filter for women, children and families only.
This seems to me a bizarre contradiction....either we have the ability to filter out or screen properly or we don't. I would think we do and would have no need to replace islamaphobia with maleaphobia.
It is also a decision that plays into the hands of the people who oppose any refugee settlement.....it acknowledges there are security concerns and since not all of the terrorists who have hijacked the good name of Islam for their purposes have been men it will lead to criticism.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-refugee-plan-women-children-families-1.3330185
If that's your belief, why do you support Trudeau? And why did you say he is better Christian than other politicians/people? If the entire faith is perverse, then where is the upside to to it or anyone that has those convictions? And speaking of your earlier point about Trudeau being a superior Christian; why then was was he photographed sitting next to Ben Levin at Pride a couple of years ago? And why was the mainstream media so hush hush about Mr. Levin? People like him are the most repugnant pieces of filth on the planet, yet most are probably unaware of this asshole because the mm ignored him until well after he was exposed (originally I believe by an Australian news outlet) and Sun News. What are your thoughts on this? That question applies to everyone reading this, as well.Christianity is peverse, does that make it immoral?
Not at all, what immoral, are Christians (or anyone) who try and make out that they better than others who are Muslim, Buddhist, not religious at all, gay, black, blue ... and who try and tell others how they should live.
Though surely the jedi have better movies coming out.
There is a far better, and "western compliant" explanation - in a deck chairs on the Titanic scenario you let the children/women/family/elderly go first. There is no need to work ourselves into a knot over it.
AoD
Editor's Note: The original version of this article used a Reuter's photograph, by Mark Blinch, of Liberal leaders Kathleen Wynne and Justin Trudeau attending the 2013 Pride March. The previous image caption identified the man sitting beside Trudeau as Benjamin Levin. The Newspaper has since received a letter from Rev Brent Hawkes, the ministry of the Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto who organized the event, which states that the man we identified as Levin is actually a different person and a member of his congregation. We regret the misattribution.
This is not the Titanic, so the analogy doesn't apply. But I agree with you that there is no need to work ourselves into a knot over it. It's disappointing, but let's not forget this is in the context of an ambitious plan to rescue 25,000 people. A lot of good is being done, and we are not all going to agree with every aspect of the process.
And, I see in the news this afternoon that there is an exception to the no men, except in families, rule. Gay men, even single men, will be permitted to form part of that first 25,000 group, given that they are at particular risk.
Unbelievable. He posted a photo of Ben Levin. So, we really do have the conspiracy-theorist wing nut here, I suppose. I repeat my comment about how desperate, and laughably irrelevant, the anti-gay movement has become.
I never said consenting adults can't fist each other. Of course they're welcome to do so. It is still a misuse of the anus by any objective standard, however. But, people can defy that if they wish.Here, I'll correct this for you... 'Fisting is not my cup of tea but consenting adults can do what they like in bed'. You're welcome.
The government/school system's mandate and responsibility is to education children. Knowledge is power and it has been demonstrated time and again that children exposed to sexual education make better choices, have lower incidents of teenage pregnancy, abortion, sexual diseases etc. You may not personally 'agree' with everything taught but that's life. You can and should continue the discussion at home, with balance, and then let your children make the choices that are right for them.
Oh dear. Anal sex has been practised since the dawn of time, and by straights and gays... so has oral sex by the way. They were and are alternatives to avoid unwanted pregnancies. You see, unlike animals humans do not have a rutting period. We have sex anytime, for bonding, for pure pleasure and emotional reasons etc. far far more often than we ever have sex for procreation... then again, if you'd ever been exposed to sexual education you might know some of this.
Don't be a bully. One doesn't get to throw around labels, without proof, just because they are gay. Let's refrain from character assassination and have a real discussion.The number of homophobes who claim to have had extensive discussions with doctors and nurses about gay men holding in their stool is always just hilarious to me. It just goes to show how desperate, and laughably irrelevant, the anti-gay movement has become.
Don't be a bully. One doesn't get to throw around labels, without proof, just because they are gay. Let's refrain from character assassination and have a real discussion.
No one, figured it out for myself, despite fear mongering from religion.Who taught you that anal sex is great?
Explain to me how it is rational to use the anus in a way that contradicts its purpose.
No one/thing persuaded you to try it? You just decided one day to try it without any knowledge of it? I find that hard to believe.No one, figured it out for myself, despite fear mongering from religion.
How is it rational for people to fly in airplanes? It's not normal, nor a proper function our bodies were designed for.
Do you reject suppositories out of moral principal as well?
Your body has no innate purpose divined to it, nor a manual saying that it's limited to specific functions as a matter of fact.