News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.4K     0 

The problem for Freeland and the Liberals is that the term had some use in the US, where the economy is truly hot and real incomes are rising for most people, but people seem to think the economy is bad. The main indicator cited for this is that when people are asked about their personal financial situation, most people say it's good and getting better. But ask them about the economy as a whole, and most people say it's bad. They just have a vibe that things aren't good out there.

In Canada, real incomes are not rising for most people, so the view that the economy isn't great is not a vibe, it's reality.

Agreed, but lets add a hard stat to that, in Toronto the unemployment rate is 8% (current to October '24). That's based on people actively looking for work, and doesn't include those who are long-term out of the workforce.

In Canada, because of the way we calculate that statistic, we always show a higher number than the U.S. in similar circumstances. But our lowest unemployment rate, and one which drives wage growth is sub-6%.

So we're well above that in Toronto, nothing vibey about it.

***

Additionally, its important to note that while CPI is declining, to a more normative level, a certain amount of damage is done, and that number continues to under-weight housing.

So even if we get some real wage growth per capita, it would take several years to catch up to the increase in core costs (housing and food) experienced by most Canadians.
 
Re: Carbon Tax - that is in fact how it is supposed to work. You're incentivized to reduce your carbon footprint, so the less carbon you emit, the more you'll get back.
But we haven’t reduced our carbon footprint. It’s like giving me an incentive not to kick a ginger 👨‍🦰. I wasn’t doing it anyway.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: T3G
They have a right to feel betrayed, because the government did shaft them.

Paywall free: https://archive.is/viOMY

But outside of strategically needed postgraduate or doctoral studies, the international student program should NEVER have been seen as a back door to permanent residence in Canada. If I go to France to get my MBA at INSEAD, or to Britain to get my DVM at the Royal Veterinary College it’s not because I want to gain permanent residency in France or Britain, but so I can obtain an excellent education with some adventure, and then return to where I came from. But Canada and its complicit provinces, universities, colleges and unregulated immigration consultants have essentially run a scam upon the subcontinent (to be fair no one is better at scamming us, so touché) and much of the developing world in order to keep tuition and education funding artificially low for Canadians. Those days of underfunding while expanding post-secondary education are rapidly coming to a close.

Every Study Permit application should have the three below terms and conditions:

1. Purpose of the Visa: This student visa is issued solely for the purpose of pursuing your studies at [Institution Name] in Canada. It is a temporary visa, and its primary function is to allow you to study and engage in academic activities. It is not a pathway to permanent residency or citizenship in Canada.

2. Temporary Nature of the Visa: Your student visa is valid only for the duration of your enrolled academic program or course of study. Upon the completion of your studies, you are required to leave Canada immediately, unless you apply for and are granted a different visa that legally allows you to remain, such as a work visa.

3. No Pathway to Permanent Residence: This student visa does not confer eligibility for permanent resident status or citizenship in Canada. You are not permitted to apply for permanent residency or citizenship while holding this visa. If you wish to apply for permanent status in Canada, you must do so separately and in person at your country of origin in accordance with the immigration laws and procedures of Canada.
 
Last edited:
All the EV building stuff is out of Trump's control. It's part of the Inflation Reduction Act authorized and funded by Congress. Unless that bill is amended or repealed. And in that case, our tax breaks and production subsidies are directly tied to the IRA, so they would expire automatically. That doesn't mean a death to the battery plants though. It's the way the industry is heading. It's probably a slowdown at worst.



That's because so much Team Trudeau came from Team McGuinty and Team Wynne. It's the same clueless lot.
There is some aggressive interpretation of presidential powers with the thinking being that the executive is not obliged to spend funds authorized by Congress. Expect litigation on the issue. This is what Musk/Vivek are hanging their hats on with their DOGE government dismantling program. Trump nominated a hard right ideologue who co-authored Project 2025 to head the budget office.

 

Back
Top