News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 9.7K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 41K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.5K     0 

Only had time for a cursory read, but the questions are mounting. And speaking of "mounting"...who will be the apt police force to investigate this? It can't be the OPP, for obvious reasons, albeit you can bet your gumshoes, unofficially, they are. The OPP will not like this meddling with their hierarchy one bit, and who can blame them? But *officially*...it's probably going to have to be the Mounties. Whether there's a mandate/protocol to cover that is a good question.

Edit to Add: Whoops, I'm too rushed, didn't read the second part beneath the mid-story banner:
Opposition critics have complained that the Ford family’s long friendship with Taverner creates a potential conflict in that it is the OPP that is typically called in to investigate the actions of government, political parties and elected officials. Under the Liberal government, the OPP was called in to investigate the ORNGE air ambulance scandal and the deleted documents gas plants scandal.
Oh boy....this is going to get awkward very fast.
 
The new head of the Ontario Provincial Police will need to testify before a tribunal about his alleged mishandling of a sexual-harassment complaint under his watch at the Toronto Police Service as he takes control of the larger service facing its own reckoning over the treatment of female employees.

In the spring, Ron Taverner is expected to testify before the province’s Human Rights Tribunal about how he handled a junior officer’s concerns about sexual harassment, including allegations he discouraged the complainant from speaking out. The OPP is also before the tribunal, facing its own human rights complaint from dozens of female members who have accused the provincial service of systemic discrimination.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/can...pid=rss&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

If it is the same OPP-HRT complaint I am thinking about, it is regarding pay equity between civilian and sworn managers. Although female dominant, to be accurate, not all complainants are female.
 
Only had time for a cursory read, but the questions are mounting. And speaking of "mounting"...who will be the apt police force to investigate this? It can't be the OPP, for obvious reasons, albeit you can bet your gumshoes, unofficially, they are. The OPP will not like this meddling with their hierarchy one bit, and who can blame them? But *officially*...it's probably going to have to be the Mounties. Whether there's a mandate/protocol to cover that is a good question.

Edit to Add: Whoops, I'm too rushed, didn't read the second part beneath the mid-story banner:

Oh boy....this is going to get awkward very fast.

The RCMP would typically be the default go-to, and they still might but they are up to their jodhpurs in their own complex case workload. It could be another large force that has the investigative depth like a western or Quebec city (although Mtl or the SQ typically don't get involved with such messes). The farther you go afield, the more costly it gets, for no other reason than simply travel and accommodation costs for investigators.
 
Only had time for a cursory read, but the questions are mounting. And speaking of "mounting"...who will be the apt police force to investigate this? It can't be the OPP, for obvious reasons, albeit you can bet your gumshoes, unofficially, they are. The OPP will not like this meddling with their hierarchy one bit, and who can blame them? But *officially*...it's probably going to have to be the Mounties. Whether there's a mandate/protocol to cover that is a good question.

Edit to Add: Whoops, I'm too rushed, didn't read the second part beneath the mid-story banner:

Oh boy....this is going to get awkward very fast.

Investigate, investigate and look under every stone -that's where you find the slime. Patrick Brown, are you watching ?
 
Investigate, investigate and look under every stone -that's where you find the slime. Patrick Brown, are you watching ?

And of course, it never ends- from the Globe:

Ontario Premier Doug Ford in battle over who will be Hydro One’s next CEO

Hydro One is looking for a new leader after Mr. Ford forced out former CEO Mayo Schmidt over what the Premier claimed was an outsized $6.2-million annual pay package during Ontario’s election campaign last spring. The entire Hydro One board, which included Ms. Peverett, resigned after Mr. Ford was elected. The new board, with four members chosen by the province and six directors named by Hydro One’s institutional shareholders, was announced in August.
...
Two sources familiar with the situation said Hydro One’s board rejected Mr. Haines at a recent meeting, with all six independent directors voting against and the four government-appointed directors voting in favour. Despite the vote, the Premier’s chief of staff, Dean French, continued to exert pressure on the board to appoint Mr. Haines as CEO, according to the sources.

When one is a slug, one can't help but be slimey.

AoD
 
^ I see the Stun is running apologism for Ford on this, and of course, the Fordites will be claiming the Globe, Star et al are Leftist Mouthpieces (the Globe has been really on his case) so thought I'd check the Washington and Oregon press to see what the coverage is like, many are running the AP newswire story, (which is scathing on Ford) and this one is written by staff, and is the second most read story of the day at this pub (and well written for a small city, 250K)

The Spokesman-Review
Spokane, Washington


Ontario Premier Doug Ford unrepentant for his role in demise of Avista-Hydro One deal
UPDATED: Thu., Dec. 6, 2018, 2:05 p.m.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford insists he’s not to blame for Washington regulators’ decision to shoot down Avista’s sale to Hydro One Ltd., which will cost the Toronto utility millions of dollars in termination fees.

In an unrepentant statement issued Thursday, Ford said he carried out campaign promises to change the leadership at the Ontario utility and bring down electric rates for Hydro One customers.

“While some critics might believe that the concerns of Ontario families, seniors, and businesses should take a back seat to foreign regulators, our government remains unwavering in our commitment to the people of Ontario to reduce hydro rates and provide a reliable energy system,” Ford said.

Within days of being sworn into office, Ford’s government asked for the resignation of Hydro One’s board of directors and the retirement of CEO Mayo Schmidt. The province is Hydro One’s largest shareholder, with a 47 percent ownership stake.

The July 11 action caused substantial harm to both Avista and Hydro One, the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission wrote in its Wednesday denial of the sale.

Avista’s shares dropped 4.5 percent in price after news of the ouster broke, and Hydro One’s shares dropped 8 percent.

With that kind of political meddling and financial risk, Washington commissioners said the $5.3 billion deal was too risky to approve.

“The province’s careless disregard for the harm done by taking politically motivated action to remove the Hydro One board and CEO is illustrated powerfully by the fact that the value of the province’s own Hydro One shares dropped by hundreds of millions of dollars,” the Washington commissioners wrote in their Wednesday decision.

Hydro One will be required to pay Avista $103 million in termination fees if the sale fails for lack of regulatory approval, according to analysts.

Avista and Hydro One are considering their options, the companies said in a statement. Two financial analysts, however, said the deal is effectively dead.

Jeremy Rosenfield of iA Securities said an appeal of Washington regulators’ decision would be unproductive. “We expect the proposed transaction to quickly unravel,” he wrote in a research note. An analyst for Guggenheim Partners said he expected Idaho to be the “Achilles heal of the transaction,” because the opposition has been vocal and included concerns from the Idaho Public Utilities Commission’s staff. Instead, Shahriar Pourreza wrote, Washington regulators “seemingly put the nail in the coffin” for the sale.

Financial markets also reacted like the deal was dead, with Avista’s stock going back to premerger-announcement prices.
Avista’s stock immediately fell nearly 14 percent in trading Thursday morning when the New York Stock Exchange opened. By 6:45 a.m., Avista’s stock price was $43.97, down 14.5 percent. That’s down from $51.50 at end of Tuesday, the last day the markets were open.
Trading has been heavy with 7.7 million shares changing hands – about 10 times the average volume.
[...]
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/dec/06/avista-stock-price-tumbles-on-opening-bell-as-inve/

Ouch! They all know who you are, and what you did Duggie..."Open for Business"....What kind of business, Duggie? Monkey Business?
 
https://www.ourwindsor.ca/news-stor...pp-says-ontario-safety-minister-sylvia-jones/

From the link: "morale among OPP officers is low and “we need someone in there who connects with front-line people, who connects with communities, who has a record of going after guns and gangs.”

I'm pretty close to many, many OPP members and I'm not aware of any low morale (perhaps after the announcement . . .). Guns and gangs is more of a Toronto/GTA problem although the OPP participates on joint forces projects.

I caught a piece on the CBC news channel today. I couldn't catch whether the speaker was a journalist, a politician or a talking head (I didn't recognize him) but he said (gist) that Taverner is a good choice because of Toronto's problem with violent crime and it's good to have a head of the OPP who can approach major crime from a Toronto perspective. What ????
 
1544148129448.png


1544148219438.png

1544148248509.png
 

This is such a garbage move.

Its an end run around sound planning, water source protection, the greenbelt and more.

There are lots of times I disagree with any government of any stripe; but never more than when I see sneaky, hypocritical moves that aren't even willfully blind to the harm they cause, but rather
completely aware, and supportive thereof.

This nonsense requires immediate interference for the purpose of rescindment.
 
What, pray tell, is an "open-for-business planning by-law"? Is this like a dimbulb Ford wording of free enterprise zones and the like? Or is it some scarier kind of 1984ish euphemism?
 

Back
Top