thettctransitfanatic
Senior Member
Even the Stun is against the Taverner appointment:
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-ford-should-rethink-taverner-appointment
I didn't know there was a newspaper named " the Stun ! "
|
|
|
Even the Stun is against the Taverner appointment:
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-ford-should-rethink-taverner-appointment
I didn't know there was a newspaper named " the Stun ! "
You obviously haven't been watching CP2Ford much or been out camping with Doug either! If you're puzzled by these too, they're long-running terms in the Rob and Doug Ford threads.
CP2Ford = unofficial tv station giving lots of time to Fords and Ford pals, maybe a little less since Stephen Ledrew left.
Camping = campaigning, from 2014 election search of Rob Ford Campaign office yielded Rob Ford Camping office.
Ya have to learn the lingo around these parts.
Hahaha. Why not... The. Greatest. Government. In. Human. History!!!
And yet they haven't even released their first budget...
In a speech to the Economic Club of Canada today, Ontario’s premier puts his government’s track record as the best, “up against any government in Canadian history.”
https://www.thestar.com/politics/po...TopTenReasonsno11DougFordisourbestpremierever
There is also John Robarts. there is likely argument for Mike Harris as well. It was easier for Robarts and Davis, since they followed competent governments.Any other government in Canadian history ?? Really DoFo? There are two governments that are Conservative in the last 60 years that are better than DoFo's : Steven Harper federally, and Bill Davis provincially.
There is also John Robarts. there is likely argument for Mike Harris as well. It was easier for Robarts and Davis, since they followed competent governments.
Harris, Ford and Scheer (upcoming) are following disasters of a government so maybe the measure needs to be relative and not absolute.
If we go to other provinces, I could find other better ones too. Ford has only been in for <1 year. In my rankings, you have to be there for 2 years before I think we have an accurate idea of their performance.
As stated, that's my list.Source?
Yeah, no bias there.As stated, that's my list.
Yeah, no bias there.
There is also John Robarts. there is likely argument for Mike Harris as well. It was easier for Robarts and Davis, since they followed competent governments.
Harris, Ford and Scheer (upcoming) are following disasters of a government so maybe the measure needs to be relative and not absolute.
If we go to other provinces, I could find other better ones too. Ford has only been in for <1 year. In my rankings, you have to be there for 2 years before I think we have an accurate idea of their performance.
...In terms of what to eat, the guide trumpets vegetables and legumes, nuts, seeds, tofu, fish and shellfish. If we must have our meat, the guide encourages us to choose lean cuts. Milk, yogurt and cheeses should be “lower fat,” the guide says. And, water should be our drink of choice.
What exactly constitutes a "disaster of a government" in your loose definitions? If it caused economic collapse (e.g.Zimbabwe), presided over the disintegration of society into anarchy and/or civil war (e.g. Afghanistan), presided over a police state (e.g. USSR) or led the state into a destructive and ruinous war (e.g. Nazi Germany) I would call it a disaster of a government. Since none of those things has happened in Ontario (yet) I find the use of "disaster of a government" to be pretty meaningless and empty, even in relativity to other administrations.It was easier for Robarts and Davis, since they followed competent governments.
Harris, Ford and Scheer (upcoming) are following disasters of a government